Started By
Message
re: Is Michigan a better job than LSU?
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:51 am to MedDawg
Posted on 1/24/24 at 10:51 am to MedDawg
quote:
Michigan more historically relevant
quote:How is it debatable? Michigan is #1 in all-time wins and was the first program to win 1000 games. Their titles are older but they have won more.
That's debatable. Sure, they have a lot of wins going back to the 1800s, but until this year they had a total of 1/2 of a national championship since 1948.
2
Posted on 1/24/24 at 11:02 am to aTm boy
quote:
Michigan is #1 in all-time wins and was the first program to win 1000 games.
This is argument makes more sense
Although Michigans eras of dominance were spread out between the early 1900s and then of course the 70s. And then some good seasons sprinkled in.
I do not think that the success of the program in those era = being a better job today.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 11:52 am to aTm boy
quote:
How is it debatable? Michigan is #1 in all-time wins and was the first program to win 1000 games. Their titles are older but they have won more.
No one gives about about someone’s record in 1935.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News