Started By
Message

re: Playoff Picture Summarized

Posted on 11/20/23 at 11:36 am to
Posted by AUTiger789
Birmingham, AL
Member since Apr 2022
1714 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 11:36 am to
If Louisville’s resume was the same but it was FSU or Clemson, then I agree. But Committee Precedent shows Louisville has zero shot getting in over teams named Ohio State, Alabama, Michigan, or Georgia.

If hairs have to be split, the more elite the program is always the deciding factor.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86595 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Committee Precedent shows Louisville has zero shot getting in over teams named Ohio State, Alabama, Michigan, or Georgia.


what are you basing that on?

If name appeal was all that mattered then teams like washington, tcu, cincinnati would've never made it. They've shown that conference titles and wins matter most.
This post was edited on 11/20/23 at 11:41 am
Posted by smokehouse_83
New Mexico
Member since Jun 2013
1401 posts
Posted on 11/20/23 at 11:55 am to
I think after last year’s embarrassment they might be alittle more careful about letting lesser teams in. I personally think Georgia could be in with a close loss to Bama. I mean they are the back to back defending Champs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter