I’m going to bring an unbiased opinion here…just clearing out the rest of the dynamics and analyzing a 12-1 Texas vs a 12-1 Bama for the last spot. Bama would get the nod and quite frankly I wouldn’t be upset about it. The argument to me of the head to head sticking supposes that Texas passes an eye test and wins out fairly convincingly. We’ve had our changes. Why we’ve left 3-4 opponents back into games and then the game tightens up and all of a sudden we’re in a dogfight to keep the W is beyond me. There have been VAST improvements, and I mostly happy with Sark, but there is still some weird psyche, DNA thing going on where we can’t blow opponents out when we are on the verge of doing so. If this was the case a committee member could ask who would win today? I don’t know for sure - but we played that game and Texas won. At this point I believe most committee members would come to the conclusion that Bama would win, and that would then be the logic. Again, Texas has themselves to blame for this. We may yet still get in but it’s going to take an FSU loss or PAC stuff. Brooks injury doesn’t help either in winning out or how committee views team, since they seem to take that into consideration. Sorry for long post, but it was necessary.