Started By
Message

re: Clemson is going to destroy Tennessee without Hooker.

Posted on 12/4/22 at 3:21 pm to
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42695 posts
Posted on 12/4/22 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Dabo has said Klubnik will start but I think Clemson could win it with DJ.


I think Klubnik is a difference maker and us not having Hooker is another difference maker. The Vandy game didn't tell us much beyond our offense can score. (Vandy had been getting better and playing fairly decent D but we still carved them up but we did it differently).

Thing is we refused to run Milton during the Vandy game because his backup has a broken collar bone and so the two QBs that remain behind him aren't great. They started the year 4th and 5th string and are suddenly 2nd and 3rd.

Watching the Vandy game, was also like watching a season opener before a big game. I thought it was strange at the time because I didn't realize the backup situation because you'd have sworn they were protecting the playbook. It was as vanilla as hell. And it was a nasty rainy game where there was no real reason to push the offense through the air.

So with that in mind I don't think we know what we have yet. Joe can throw a 80 yard TD but he can also overthrow balls (we might not be fair to him on this bc Hooker overthrow balls too -- it's just that's what people remember of the first few games he started but they don't remember the WR drops or that we were replacing pretty much the entire WR corps).

So do we get a lot of miscues or not? And even if we do get those overthrows can we still score? I think we can. Heupel is just too damned good not to find a way to score *but* will it be enough against a Clemson team that is in the opposite situation and finally found it's QB.

Our defense isn't good against the pass. It is stout against the run but you can throw on us all day. Last game, we had 4 DBs out and we didn't feel it since we held Vandy to 0.

And another question... I don't know how many opt outs we're going to have and at what positions. I wouldn't be surprised if Tillman (heh) skips it since he's been hurt all season long. I hope that Hyatt plays and McCoy. It's hard to tell since we basically saw Squirrel White at WR all game vs. Vandy.

How do your opt outs and injuries look?
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12368 posts
Posted on 12/4/22 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

How do your opt outs and injuries look?


Not sure, i think all of the NFL bound players played in the Cheeze It bowl last year.

Tenn does look better at WR than Clemson and and Clemson does give up some chunk plays in the air. I think Clemson is going to have NFL talent on defense like Breese come back for one more season due to underperforming this year.

it should be a decent bowl game and a rare matchup. I had seen an Clemson-Alabama matchup projected. Most ppeopl are tired of seeing that one.

If Hooker could play, this bowl probably ould have the most viewers outside of the title game.
This post was edited on 12/4/22 at 3:28 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter