Started By
Message

re: Missouri at No. 25 South Carolina (-6)

Posted on 10/24/22 at 9:31 am to
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25890 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 9:31 am to
quote:

And that same list has New York State as #5 for Natural environment and Utah #47.


I wouldn’t worry about rankings. Just follow the people and that will tell where people want to live. SC’s population has boomed, KS’ has dwindled because no one that can afford to move would choose to live in that place.
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65566 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 9:33 am to
I don’t want rampant booming population.

Posted by mizslu314
Dirty STL
Member since Sep 2013
15985 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 9:37 am to
quote:

SC’s population has boomed,


Is this really a thing? No knock as I like SC, just have not heard this happening there at all.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter