Started By
Message
re: Why the lack of bluebloods in the SEC?
Posted on 7/9/22 at 4:17 pm to lewis and herschel
Posted on 7/9/22 at 4:17 pm to lewis and herschel
quote:
I really dont see texas as a blue blood, they should be maybe, but in my 5 decades they have had some highs but far more lowes.
No doubt they are fringe and could go either way. They would make my list, but i don't think there is a definitive list naming bluebloods. Maybe there is? I don't know.
1
Posted on 7/9/22 at 5:51 pm to DawgsLife
No disrespect to Michigan but they’ve won a 1/2 National Championship in 74 years. And that 97 Nebraska team would have steamrolled Michigan.
Oklahoma hasn’t won a NC in 20 years
Texas has won one National Championship in 50 years
Ohio State has won 2 NC in 50 years
USC has won one NC in over 40 years
Nebraska hasn’t won a NC in 25 years
Notre Dame hasn’t won a NC in 33 years
In the last 25 years
LSU has won 3
Florida has won 2
Florida State has won 2
In the last 40 years Miami has won 5 NC
The idea of a blue blood is pretty fluid, but based on consistency it’s not hard to argue that Alabama is really the only blue blood.
Oklahoma hasn’t won a NC in 20 years
Texas has won one National Championship in 50 years
Ohio State has won 2 NC in 50 years
USC has won one NC in over 40 years
Nebraska hasn’t won a NC in 25 years
Notre Dame hasn’t won a NC in 33 years
In the last 25 years
LSU has won 3
Florida has won 2
Florida State has won 2
In the last 40 years Miami has won 5 NC
The idea of a blue blood is pretty fluid, but based on consistency it’s not hard to argue that Alabama is really the only blue blood.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News