Started By
Message

re: Why the lack of bluebloods in the SEC?

Posted on 7/9/22 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58969 posts
Posted on 7/9/22 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

For all of their success it is hard to believe that they have only 1 blueblood.



Because we spread the wealth around and don't consolidate it to one or two programs.

For instance. Since two different teams from the BIG 10 won titles we have had 6 different teams from the SEC win.

Sorry. I don't mean to be laughing at the BIG 10.

I lied. I did mean to be laughing.

Even the ACC has two titles since the BIG 10 won their last.
This post was edited on 7/9/22 at 2:25 pm
Posted by TideFaninFl
On the space coast
Member since Oct 2017
6654 posts
Posted on 7/9/22 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Because we spread the wealth around and don't consolidate it to one or two programs.

For instance. Since two different teams from the BIG 10 won titles we have had 6 different teams from the SEC win.

Sorry. I don't mean to be laughing at the BIG 10.

I lied. I did mean to be laughing.



It gets worse for the Big Ten

The SEC AVERAGES three NC per decade since 1950. The only decade that the SEC did not win 3 was the 1980's were the SEC won 1.

Since 1970, the Big Ten has won 3 NC in football


Individual southern schools have either topped that number or tied it since 1980

Miami (Fl) - 5
Florida - 3
FSU - 3
Alabama- 7
LSU - 3
Clemson - 3

so out of 43 years southern schools have won over half the titles

(and my list does not include Georgia, Auburn, or Tennessee)

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter