Started By
Message
re: 1-7 scheduling model gaining momentum per SI’s Ross Dellinger
Posted on 6/7/22 at 8:02 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Posted on 6/7/22 at 8:02 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
I don't think any of the schools losing rivalry games should say yes to the 1-7 option. IMO that includes (but is not limited to) Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, LSU, and Tennessee.
But if forced to choose? Even if Florida and Georgia were on the same page they might be out voted by the other schools. The big six playing each other is more balanced than Tennessee vs Vanderbilt, LSU vs A&M or Arkansas etc.
And the very oldest people in power may have loyalty to the oldest rivalries. Should Alabama, Auburn, Georgia, and Tennessee really stop playing the longest annual rivalry games? Especially when Florida's #1 is probably FSU?
But if forced to choose? Even if Florida and Georgia were on the same page they might be out voted by the other schools. The big six playing each other is more balanced than Tennessee vs Vanderbilt, LSU vs A&M or Arkansas etc.
And the very oldest people in power may have loyalty to the oldest rivalries. Should Alabama, Auburn, Georgia, and Tennessee really stop playing the longest annual rivalry games? Especially when Florida's #1 is probably FSU?
2
Posted on 6/7/22 at 8:03 pm to molsusports
Vols probably want 1-7 so they get Vandy or UK every year instead of annual Bama beatdowns.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 8:06 pm to molsusports
quote:
I don't think any of the schools losing rivalry games should say yes to the 1-7 option.
So in other words every school should vote no to 1-7
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News