Started By
Message
re: 1-7 scheduling model gaining momentum per SI’s Ross Dellinger
Posted on 6/6/22 at 1:14 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 6/6/22 at 1:14 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Hmm
I guess Sankey never reviewed this with all the schools prior to last summer. Wonder what the vote would have been if they knew they would possibly lose rivalry games.
I guess Sankey never reviewed this with all the schools prior to last summer. Wonder what the vote would have been if they knew they would possibly lose rivalry games.
This post was edited on 6/6/22 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 6/6/22 at 1:18 pm to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
I guess Sankey never reviewed this with all the schools prior to last summer. Wonder what the vote would have been if they knew they would possibly lose rivalry games.
You don't really lose them. They just get played every other year instead of every year, and you still get the 1 main one.
A 2-6 would be fine with me also, or even a 3-5. Rotate these teams, get rid of divisions that are so ridiculously unbalanced. Stay at 8 because it's smart, schedule higher quality OOC games to get to a minimum of 10 P5 if desired(I desire it).
SEC teams will finally start to have SoS's that are evened out among teams rather than a few teams like say Arkansas that constantly have the toughest schedule in the country.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)