Started By
Message
re: 1998: the new 1980
Posted on 5/30/22 at 9:39 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Posted on 5/30/22 at 9:39 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
The same 4 teams in the CFP every single year have been the same 4 teams in the simulated BCS.
This isnt a coincidence either.
0
Posted on 5/30/22 at 9:39 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
As I posted earlier,how in God's name could the justify taking UT over a 3 loss LSU team that just beat em?
Because LSU had 3 losses???
The BCS had UT behind a UF team they just beat the week prior.
Of all the arguments posted here that is by far the worst reasoning for why UT wouldn't be in it.
This post was edited on 5/30/22 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 5/30/22 at 9:52 pm to KellerChrystFan
quote:
The BCS had UT behind a UF team they just beat the week prior.
Everyone did.
That UGA loss meant Vols had no room for error vs a 3 loss team with key players off the field.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 9:54 pm to djsdawg
And in today's world they drop 1 or 2 spots for losing in the SECCG. Just the way the world is now, baw. 
You would think we lost to Fresno State, not a Nick Saban coached LSU team that finished in the top 10.
You would think we lost to Fresno State, not a Nick Saban coached LSU team that finished in the top 10.
This post was edited on 5/30/22 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:00 pm to KellerChrystFan
quote:
And in today's world they drop 1 or 2 spots for losing in the SECCG.
Doubtful due to how bad that loss was.
Want precedent? In 2001, Florida fell from 2nd to 6th with their 2nd loss, so vol wrong again.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:01 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Doubtful due to how bad that loss was.
I laughed. quote:
Want precedent?
quote:
In 2001
Let me stop you right there.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:05 pm to KellerChrystFan
quote:
Because LSU had 3 losses???
They weren't even ranked in the BCS
Jesus Christ ya still can't make an argument on why a committee would take
a UT that lost in week 14 to a 3 loss unranked LSU team.
Yeah,late season losses to unranked teams usually have a tendency to screw up your playoff/NC hopes.
quote:
BCS had UT behind a UF team they just beat the week prior
Last chance to state UT's case or just STFU.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:07 pm to KellerChrystFan
quote:
Let me stop you right there.
11 point loss to an 8-3 team with a backup QB is gonna knock you down in any era.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:09 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
They weren't even ranked in the BCS
Jesus Christ ya still can't make an argument on why a committee would take
a UT that lost in week 14 to a 3 loss unranked LSU team.
Moving those goalposts. F*cking retard.
LSU was ranked in the top 15 when we played them. BCS only ranks their top 15 teams.
quote:
Yeah,late season losses to unranked teams usually have a tendency to screw up your playoff/NC hopes.
I enjoyed this ironic statement.
I'll repeat this again since it makes you look like a fool.
quote:
BCS had UT behind a UF team they just beat the week prior
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:12 pm to djsdawg
UT led at halftime and it was a 4-point game until the final 2 minutes.
LSU was dead in the water until Mauck came in so I'm not sure how the backup QB is a burn.
This should knock you down in any era.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/game/_/gameId/213270038
LSU was dead in the water until Mauck came in so I'm not sure how the backup QB is a burn.
This should knock you down in any era.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/game/_/gameId/213270038
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:14 pm to KellerChrystFan
quote:
LSU was ranked in the top 15 when we played them.
Vol wrong again...
#20 and #21 in the 2 polls.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:16 pm to KellerChrystFan
You're embarrassing yourself
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:17 pm to KellerChrystFan
quote:
LSU was dead in the water until Mauck came in so I'm not sure how the backup QB is a burn.
Cool. Makes it even worse.
People tend to frown upon losing to an 8-3 team that forced to use its backup QB and RB.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:17 pm to djsdawg
Tell ESPN to fix their link then. For whatever reason they posted their rankings the week after the game.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/game/_/gameId/213420099
Don't really care. Not much of a difference in losing to #13 and #20.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/game/_/gameId/213420099
Don't really care. Not much of a difference in losing to #13 and #20.
This post was edited on 5/30/22 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:18 pm to djsdawg
Except when the backup QB is better than the starter.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:21 pm to KellerChrystFan
quote:
Don't really care. Not much of a difference in losing to #13 and #20.
Probably right, so even if Vols lost to a #13 team rather than #20, the big drop still happens.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:23 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
You're embarrassing yourself
Thanks for your contribution to the thread.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:24 pm to KellerChrystFan
quote:
Except when the backup QB is better than the starter.
Too bad the starter QB was better than his backup.
This goes for the RB that got hurt too.
Posted on 5/30/22 at 10:25 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Too bad the starter QB was better than his backup.
He wasn't.
quote:
This goes for the RB that got hurt too.
I don't remember him. He probably was.
Page 12 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News