Started By
Message

re: As the Bonfire Burns™

Posted on 5/11/22 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by Hugh McElroy
Member since Sep 2013
17572 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

They wouldn’t have standing as long as they were free to transfer. The punishment wouldn’t be for NIL, it would be for using NIL as an inducement to sign.


They could easily have standing by arguing that even with the opportunity to transfer, they’d employment opportunities were hindered. Imagine a senior starting QB plausibly arguing that the necessity of transfer hurts his future employment opportunities.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84933 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Imagine a senior starting QB plausibly arguing that the necessity of transfer hurts his future employment opportunities.


As long as his eligibility wasn’t impacted it wouldn’t matter. He would not be forced to transfer from A&M, it would be his choice based on whatever the penalties were. And as there are plenty of players who get drafted not playing in a playoff or even for a major school there’s not really an argument that it would harm his NFL future.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter