Started By
Message

re: New NIL Guidelines passed

Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:28 pm to
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7636 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:28 pm to
That may or may not be. It depends on how the NCAA sanctions the school. The fact it may harm the booster’s business isn’t enough to constitute tortuous interference. They have to prove intent to interfere, not simply that it resulted from sanctions against the school. The NCAA could still sanction the school and the fact that a booster suffers harm indirectly will not give rise to tortious interference, even if the NCAA knows that may result in harm to the booster’s interests.
This post was edited on 5/9/22 at 7:30 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter