Started By
Message

re: New NIL Guidelines passed

Posted on 5/9/22 at 6:50 pm to
Posted by BigSneezy
Member since Nov 2020
1903 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

How so? We weren't the programs on Twitter announcing pay for play for various positions on the field. The collectives are going to have a problem from this, simply because the only businesses that give a crap have boosters involved. But that is why they hired lawyers and went through compliance. Good luck to the NCAA. We'll be a target, but so should numerous schools dumb enough to advertise pay per play in the open


Y’all act like our “ boosters” are some bubba in a car dealership. The NCAA won’t push around these corporations, the corporations will sue them. These “boosters” are legitimate, wealthy, corporations that have legal teams and corporate counsel.

Y’all act like it’s just some due slipping someone some cash. Lmao.

Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7636 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:00 pm to
It may not be that simple. It will depend in part on who is actually sanctioned. If the boosters are not sanctioned themselves, but the school is, the boosters may not have standing to sue. Having money and lawyers doesn’t give standing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter