Started By
Message
2
Posted on 5/4/22 at 5:21 pm to KaiserSoze99
I know for a fact that Auburn Compliance cleared Auburn’s NIL collective which has already raised over $7million to cover current NIL contracts. That entire collective is funded by around 10 men/families which could all be considered “boosters” by the antiquated NCAA description. Hell, one of the biggest contributors also funded the lions share of Gus’ buyout. He’s a major decision maker in AU Athletics and he was behind giving Gus his contract extension of $49M guaranteed after he beat UGA and Bama back to back. The man had to pony up and pay Gus the buyout. HE is the epitome of an Auburn booster/supporter. And he’s backing their NIL now.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 7:40 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Show me the rule that "boosters" cannot strike NIL deals with student-athletes.
Or maybe you should try reading the OP, which says all this shite.
I mean it even directly says in the article itself:
quote:
Under a long-held NCAA rule, boosters are a representative arm of an athletic department and are not supposed to associate with or persuade prospects.
quote:
"The guidelines, still in draft form, outline that booster-backed collectives should be prohibited from associating with high school prospects and college transfers, potentially opening the door for contentious legal challenges between the association and booster groups"
Schools that do not control their donors’ spending could be found to have violated NCAA rules and will be sanctioned, according to the document. The NCAA enforcement staff have made inquiries only into a small handful of programs so far, but the guidelines could spark deeper investigations into improper inducements tied to NIL payments.
Same shite I've been saying for weeks and all you A&M fans keep saying is that I'm wrong.
Personally, I think the reality is starting to sink in for you.
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 7:41 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News