Started By
Message
re: UT vs Vandy Bat Inspection Procedure
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:34 pm to blackgold61
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:34 pm to blackgold61
Did you read the article? Vandy had a bat that did not pass inspection. I am wondering if this particular bat has been used before and just caught. Why would Vandy present an illegal bat to be certified unless they have used this bat before? Vandy was the one that had the illegal bat not UT.
2
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:41 pm to VolMarine1371
Obviously, if bats are being inspected its not just to see if there is a sticker on them. They wouldnt inspect them if there werent quite a few bats that have been suspected of not being legal. Ibet as far as you are concerned that Vandy bat is the only one this season that hasnt passed inspection. And that came from a Vol writer so probably BS
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:59 pm to VolMarine1371
quote:
Did you read the article? Vandy had a bat that did not pass inspection. I am wondering if this particular bat has been used before and just caught. Why would Vandy present an illegal bat to be certified unless they have used this bat before? Vandy was the one that had the illegal bat not UT.
Why would it pass other inspections, but fail this one?
I have no dog in this race, but you are literally just making shite up.
Maybe college should start using real bats.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News