Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/28/24 at 9:16 am to GoCrazyAuburn
I thought it was obviously incomplete
Posted on 9/28/24 at 10:20 am to auburnnyc94
Same, I felt they made the correct call to reverse. In real time, I can see why they called it a catch.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 10:45 am to Je23Mo
quote:
In real time, I can see why they called it a catch.
I was surprised they called it a catch initially. But they did and then I thought wow this thing is going to stand. Once it's called I dont see how they had conclusive evidence the ball was dropped. Play should have stood. The initial call is extremely important when there is a scrum and the ball is underneath or blocked by a top layer of bodies.
This post was edited on 9/28/24 at 10:49 am
Posted on 9/28/24 at 11:28 am to jangalang
Absolutely. I was shocked they overturned it, because as you said, original call and the rules behind that. It looked loose in replays to me.
Everything you said is valid. It was a wild game.
Everything you said is valid. It was a wild game.
Page 2 of 2
Latest Auburn News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News