Started By
Message
re: Alternate uniform question
Posted on 12/16/12 at 1:37 pm to Rig
Posted on 12/16/12 at 1:37 pm to Rig
quote:
Says the one arguing back about why AU should change uniforms. Pot, kettle, etc.
Uh, find one time that I've argued that we should change uniforms. That wasn't what I was arguing about at all.
I'll hang up and listen.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 1:46 pm to WarSlamEagle
quote:
Again, bigger/better programs than Auburn have modified/added to their uniforms recently.
quote:
BUT WE'VE NEVER CHANGED OUR UNIFORMS
Yeah you continue to mention that you don't support it but you keep trying to point our valid reasons that AU should change it up. Those are just two quotes that could lead one to believe that you are arguing in support for change.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 1:47 pm to Rig
I want a jersey with an eagle riding a tiger on the front
Posted on 12/16/12 at 1:49 pm to Lee County Tiger
I want one with a tiger riding an eagle riding a plainsman while rolling Toomer's.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 1:52 pm to Rig
quote:
Yeah you continue to mention that you don't support it but you keep trying to point our valid reasons that AU should change it up. Those are just two quotes that could lead one to believe that you are arguing in support for change.
You could think that, but that would totally go against what I said. If I say that I don't want changes, I don't want changes. You can try to twist my words and make it look like I'm arguing for changes, but you're wrong.
My problem was with the people that say that only lesser and gimmicky teams change up their look. That's what I argued against. Also, I was arguing against the people who said we never changed and we never will.
Just because I pointed out valid reasons doesn't mean I support it. If you read what I actually typed out, you'll know I'm not arguing for change.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 2:01 pm to WarSlamEagle
quote:To be fair, you didn't mention you were anti-change until well after those posts.
You could think that, but that would totally go against what I said. If I say that I don't want changes, I don't want changes. You can try to twist my words and make it look like I'm arguing for changes, but you're wrong.
quote:Carry on.
Just because I pointed out valid reasons doesn't mean I support it. If you read what I actually typed out, you'll know I'm not arguing for change.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 2:04 pm to Rig
quote:
To be fair, you didn't mention you were anti-change until well after those posts.
This is true. Didn't realize this until I went back and looked.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 2:09 pm to WarSlamEagle
So is this thread not even in support of changing just being argumentative that auburn should be open to change or have goofy uniform day?
We should drop the tramp stamp and call it a day.
Unrelated question. What are the splits here between joining the fad of alt unis and age? I'm guessing 25+ leave it be under is hoping for some updated unis
We should drop the tramp stamp and call it a day.
Unrelated question. What are the splits here between joining the fad of alt unis and age? I'm guessing 25+ leave it be under is hoping for some updated unis
This post was edited on 12/16/12 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 12/16/12 at 2:10 pm to piggidyphish
quote:
We should drop the tramp stamp and call it a day.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 2:17 pm to piggidyphish
quote:
We should drop the tramp stamp and call it a day.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 2:31 pm to TheSandman
As things change, somethings always remain...War Eagle everyone!!
Posted on 12/17/12 at 9:39 am to WarSlamEagle
quote:
Nope. I thought it and it magically appeared on my screen.
You said that teams without tradition are the ones that change up their uniforms.
I proved that wrong.
Then you make another statement based on personal opinion. Nothing wrong with that, just start off with that next time. Don't make stuff up that's completely wrong. I don't think Auburn needs to change up their uniforms either, but I don't make statements like you did and then have to back up to arguing from my opinion.
That was what I called backtracking.
Look, I don't really care enough to argue. You win.
I never stated any facts, I gave my opinion and it hasn't changed. We could argue over tradition all day but it's pointless.
Congratulations, you're victorious. I'm sure your parents are proud. I'm going to go lick my e-wounds and wonder if I'll recover.
Anyway- I don't recall seeing some of those uniform combos in any games, did they all actually play a game in those?
Posted on 12/17/12 at 11:16 am to slacker130
quote:
Congratulations, you're victorious. I'm sure your parents are proud. I'm going to go lick my e-wounds and wonder if I'll recover.
quote:
Anyway- I don't recall seeing some of those uniform combos in any games, did they all actually play a game in those?
The Michigan one was against Notre Dame last year, when Denard went off under the lights.
Army one is from a year or two ago, but I think they still use it.
Navy one is from this year.
Nebraska, Wisconsin, and Notre Dame are from this year as well.
Ohio State wore that one against Michigan a couple of years ago.
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News