Started By
Message

re: 2017 Football Recruiting Thread ["N$D Bryant" Edition]

Posted on 12/22/16 at 3:45 pm to
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52429 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Good luck. I wasted three pages trying to get that answer.

No you wasted time seeking more than just this question. Don't be ridiculous.
I'd feel confident saying that the following are our backup plan commitments.
-Travion
-Igbinoghene
-Sal
-Jordyn Peters

Im sure Jordan Tucke, Tamorrion, and others will follow.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38801 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

S - Devon Hunter


*fap*
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40456 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

No you wasted time seeking more than just this question. Don't be ridiculous.


quote:

-Igbinoghene
-Sal


Great, you just agreed to the ones I originally gave and that offensively, we aren't filling needs with backup plans, again.

This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 3:58 pm
Posted by AU24
Toomers Corner
Member since Dec 2014
4523 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

QB - Jarrett Stidham 
OL - Brodarious HAMM / 2016 Signee just arrived in AU 
OL - Tashawn Manning / 2016 Signee will arrive in January 
LS - Bill Taylor / Blue Shirt won't count towards this class 
RB - Devan Barrett 
RB - Alaric Williams 
RB - Octavius Mathews 
FB - Chase Lasater 
TE - Salvatore Cannella 
WR - Noah Igbinoghene 
WR - Tamorrion Terry 
OT - Calvin Ashley 
OT - Austin Troxell 
OG - Nick Brahms 
OT - Jordan Tucker 
DE - Ryan Johnson 
DE - Alec Jackson 
DE - Markaviest Bryant 
LB - Tadarian Moultry 
LB - CHandler WOoten 
LB - Kenny Britt 
LB - Tyler Taylor 
CB - Malcolm Askew 
CB - Traivon Leonard 
S - Jordyn Peters 
S - Carlito Gonzalez 
S - Devon Hunter 
PK - Anders Carlson 



That would be a top 5 class but we probably wont get 2 or 3 of those guys
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 3:48 pm to
that is a solid recruiting class
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40456 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

QB - Jarrett Stidham
OL - Brodarious HAMM / 2016 Signee just arrived in AU
DT - Tashawn Manning / 2016 Signee will arrive in January
LS - Bill Taylor / Blue Shirt won't count towards this class
RB - Devan Barrett
RB - Alaric Williams
RB - Octavius Mathews
FB - Chase Lasater
TE - Salvatore Cannella
WR - Noah Igbinoghene
WR - Tamorrion Terry
OT - Calvin Ashley
OT - Austin Troxell
OG - Nick Brahms
OT - Jordan Tucker
DE - Ryan Johnson
DE - Alec Jackson
DE - Markaviest Bryant
LB - Tadarian Moultry
LB - CHandler WOoten
LB - Kenny Britt
LB - Tyler Taylor
CB - Malcolm Askew
CB - Traivon Leonard
S - Jordyn Peters
S - Carlito Gonzalez
S - Devon Hunter
PK - Anders Carlson


I'd be stoked with this class. WR a little bit of a let down however projects are okay this year based off of last year's class.

I'd assume one of Alec Jackon or Ryan Johnson would end up joining Tashawn Manning as eventual DT's.
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 3:50 pm
Posted by TigerPaw1
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Apr 2011
16979 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

-Jordyn Peters


Probably only one I really disagree with. We jumped all over him after camp. Staff pushed for his commitment early

Also find it interesting that all those below 4* other than Matthews are considered backups in your mind

Tucker is definitely a backup plan. Terry is tricky because his academics are bad. He's getting pressure from big schools but could be backup for them as well
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52429 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Also find it interesting that all those below 4* other than Matthews are considered backups in your mind

The rank is irrelevant, when a coach settles on another player because the first choice said no, the said player is by default the backup plan. Isn't Carlito a three star? He isn't a backup plan as far as I know.
quote:

Probably only one I really disagree with. We jumped all over him after camp. Staff pushed for his commitment early

This one must be a camp warrior. Have seen him play and his skills are not great. Saw him get burnt by a kid from Gardendale this past season.
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 4:07 pm
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52429 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Great, you just agreed to the ones I originally gave and that offensively, we aren't filling needs with backup plans, again.

You're getting closer. Except we are not filling needs with backup plans only because those two are not in position of need. You could say Jordan Tucker is a backup plan to Leatherwood and OT is a position in need, though.
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 4:20 pm
Posted by TigerPaw1
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Apr 2011
16979 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

The rank is irrelevant, when a coach settles on another player because the first choice said no, the said player is by default the backup plan. Isn't Carlito a three star? He isn't a backup plan as far as I know. 


Ya him and Wooten are

If it makes you feel better McGriff has been recruiting Leonard since the summer

quote:

This one must be a camp warrior. Have seen him play and his skills are not great. Saw him get burnt by a kid from Gardendale this past season.


Fair enough. But staff went after him pretty early so backup plan is stretch. Guessing they think can coach up all the athleticism

I agree on Iggy and to an extent on Cannella. McKitty has been top target but he didn't like our use of TE. I think Cannella is a hell of a backup tho. Disagree with your earlier statement tho on us having so many backup plans. Outside of WR and DL we have done pretty darn well this cycle
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52429 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Outside of WR and DL we have done pretty darn well this cycle

Our projected class looks solid. Still not a win yet though. Mckitty has been on the list many times after all.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40456 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

You're getting closer. Except we are not filling needs with backup plans only because those two are not in position of need.




And I quote:
quote:

Yeah...."crushing" our needs with backup plans


Which one is it?

quote:

You could say Jordan Tucker is a backup plan to Leatherwood and OT is a position in need, though.

This would make your original statement true, if we didn't already have the position of need filled with the likes of a 5* OT and another 150 OT. So no, I would not say we are filling our need at OT with backup plans. (ETA: assuming we get Tucker)
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 4:50 pm
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52429 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

quote: Yeah...."crushing" our needs with backup plans

You still can't see the sarcasm? Come on S.S.
And obviously Jordan Tucker is a backup plan if we move on from Alex Leatherwood to him.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40456 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

And obviously Jordan Tucker is a backup plan if we move on from Alex Leatherwood to him.


I never said he wasn't a backup plan. I said we wouldn't be filling our need at OT with backup plans because of the other commits we have. Come on jangalang.

quote:

You still can't see the sarcasm? Come on S.S.


Considering it took you over three pages to decide you didn't actually mean what you said in that post after I referenced and quoted it multiple times, not buying it.

This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 5:01 pm
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52429 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Considering it took you over three pages to decide you didn't actually mean what you said in that post

It's in black and white
For three pages I've been wondering how obnoxiously obtuse you really were.
quote:

I said we wouldn't be filling out need at OT with backup plans because of the other commits we have.

If OT depth isn't a need, then why go after the guy?
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 5:04 pm
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38801 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

GoCrazyAuburn


You enjoy bashing your head against brick walls, I see.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40456 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

It's in black and white
For three pages I've been wonder how obnoxiously obtuse you really were.


The black and white part where you first claimed you didn't say what I showed you said? Or the part where changed the argument to you didn't really mean what you said after I showed you said it? Who exactly is being obtuse?

quote:

If OT depth isn't a need, then why go after the guy?

Good lord your comprehension skills. I never said OT is not a need. Seeing as the OT need has been met by two non backups, there is no way you can logically argue we are filling the OT need by backups if only 1 out of 3 is a backup.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40456 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

You enjoy bashing your head against brick walls, I see.


I get an itch about three times a year. Usually when I'm having to do year end or quarterly financials, not sure if there is a connection or not
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 5:08 pm
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52429 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

The black and white part where you first claimed you didn't say what I showed you said? Or the part where changed the argument to you didn't really mean what you said after I showed you said it? Who exactly is being obtuse?

Why don't you start from the top, control your breathing, and type your thoughts in a manner that conveys your thoughts a lot better.
quote:

there is no way you can logically argue we are filling the OT need by backups if only 1 out of 3 is a backup.

I have never argued this. Talking about reading comprehension issues...
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40456 posts
Posted on 12/22/16 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Why don't you start from the top, control your breathing, and type your thoughts in a manner that conveys your thoughts a lot better.


I think you're starting to understand the dissonance that has been your argument in this discussion.

quote:

I have never argued this. Talking about reading comprehension issues...


Jesus Christ.
So when you replied to my comment on us not filling our OT needs with backup plans due to our other commits with:
quote:

If OT depth isn't a need, then why go after the guy?

You weren't making a counter point to us not filling our OT needs with a backup plan? If so, you may not want to quote and respond to a point that you aren't arguing against next time.
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 5:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 193 of 312Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter