Started By
Message
Posted on 2/9/13 at 5:05 pm to HawgAlude
What in your past gives you any experience at analyzing football.... you have no resume for this subject matter...there for your argument is moot.....
And getting injected with the seman of a head coach doesn't count. Sorry.
And getting injected with the seman of a head coach doesn't count. Sorry.
Posted on 2/9/13 at 6:08 pm to HawgAlude
quote:
Petrino at least could win one of them, How many has Bielema won?
Zero that is how many.
In all seriousness that is a pretty irrelevant fact you have there. BP has been to 2, BB 3. Bob has 1 win. Bret 0. That is too small a sample to even try to make any sort of judgement.
Now if each had to been to 5 or 6 than maybe you could make some sort of comparison to which coach is better but unless you're willing to concede that Chizik > Petrino I think we can say that your stat of 1 win versus 0 is meaningless.
Posted on 2/9/13 at 6:39 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
quote:
I too have a question for Hawg Alude.
When you balls suck up inside your body, do you push the fleshy sack back and out of the way or do you fluff up forward like to appear as if there are scrotum present?
will wait for reply.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 12:13 pm to Latarian
I'm not going to lie. I would take Petrino over Bielema any day.
However, given the circumstances, I am not disappointed with this hire at all.
Petrino had his methodologies, and no one can deny that they worked.
Bielema also has his methodology, which is very different from that of Petrino, and it seems to be working right now, especially in recruiting, which was a glaring weakness under Petrino.
However, given the circumstances, I am not disappointed with this hire at all.
Petrino had his methodologies, and no one can deny that they worked.
Bielema also has his methodology, which is very different from that of Petrino, and it seems to be working right now, especially in recruiting, which was a glaring weakness under Petrino.
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top


0






