Started By
Message

re: Where do you rank the Iron Bowl among the greatest rivalries in sports?

Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:00 pm to
Posted by KSGamecock
The Woodlands, TX
Member since May 2012
22982 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:00 pm to
It's up there, probably in the top tier with OSU-Michigan but like others have said, these are all regional. I have a lot of family in the Midwest and they introduced me to CFB, to them and most of their neighbors it was Packers/Bears/Vikings, Wisconsin/Minnesota/Iowa and Wisconsin/Marquette as the most important rivalries with the Game being the only big rivalry game not involving a local team that people cared about. These people enjoyed two things: drinking and sports and I never ever heard them mention the Iron Bowl.

The Iron bowl is big and people in Alabama and the South do care about it, especially recently but it's certainly not a huge deal nationally. I hadn't paid it too much attention until I started college. Even today I know exactly who I root for when Michigan plays OSU but I haven't figured out the Iron Bowl...I enjoy watching, enjoy it more than the Game, but as far as who wins...I just don't give a frick.

That's just my little anecdote but it's what I've experienced. Usually no one cares about the IB outside of the south.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108124 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Celtics/Lakers. Oh goodness California is going to your head.


They're separated by 3000 fricking miles. They don't really ever have to put up with the bullshite of the opposing fanbase. They just say to each other how much they hate the pther and run into each other once in a blue moon. It's a joke to compare that to any of the great college or European rivalries. The only one even in the contest of hatred between the fanbase a are the Yankees and the Red Sox.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44013 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:02 pm to
To much of the nation, Alabama/Auburn is just another game.
Conversely, in Alabama--a state w/o pro-sports--it's tough for anyone to imagine not caring about the IB.
Again, it's all about one's perspective.
And everyone's is different.
This post was edited on 12/1/13 at 10:09 pm
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:02 pm to
SI says hail low.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56010 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:05 pm to
I would say best in the SEC but OSU/UM is a bigger rivalry.

In all of sports I would say nothing beats Yanks/Red Soxs.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79153 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:08 pm to
You're right, but you can appreciate the absurdity of the Iron Bowl as an outsider.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108124 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

which is why the 2010 nba finals was the highest watched NBA finals series in years. 28.2 million people watched game 7 in 2010. how many do you think watched the iron bowl this past week>


Out of that 28 million that watched, I bet half weren't avid Celtic or Lakers fans. Station ratings are irrelevant to a rivalry, because who really gives a frick about outsiders in a rivalry? It's between the two of them. I seriously doubt that someone from LA is going to be automatically hostile to someone from Boston. New Yorkers though with Bostonians and vice versa, hell yeah they're going to be hostile when sports are even slightly brought up.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145129 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

I seriously doubt that someone from LA is going to be automatically hostile to someone from Boston

as a city? maybe not. if you are a laker fan in boston and vice versa? um yes you will
LINK
This post was edited on 12/1/13 at 10:12 pm
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

They don't really ever have to put up with the bullshite of the opposing fanbase.


Putting up with local bullshite isn't something that makes the sports rivalry any greater except to those people that live it. The politics of A&M/tu, to whoever mentioned legislative shite, puts Auburn/Alabama to shame, I promise. But no one outside of the state cares or knows anything about it, so why is it relative?
Posted by carolinaswamper
unincorporated swamp, johns island,
Member since Jan 2013
3142 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:13 pm to
its so great that verne and gary had multiple mutual orgasms and the all of espn was awash in splooge after each highlight package of the game was played.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108124 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

Because nationally, it isn't as relevant. The most important and nationally relevant Iron Bowl ever happened yesterday. It still didn't have as good of ratings as Game 7 of the 2010 NBA Finals, or even Texas A&M/Alabama this year.


I really don't see why the national relevance of a rivalry has to do with how great the rivalry is. Was the fact that the Hatfields and the McCoys didn't have statewide or national consequences make it not a great rivalry? You look at it on how each of the fanbases react to someone. A guy from LA is not going to give a frick if someone is from Boston. A guy from Columbus is going to have some strong prejudices against a guy from Ann Arbor though.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79153 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:14 pm to
I assume you mean relevant, and I think it is. Maybe you're just pro-centric, but I think a football game that impacts the politics of a huge state is a testament to the magnitude of the rivalry.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108124 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

there is nothing in this world that i hate more than the boston celtics


Good for you, but I don't think a very sizable portion of LA agrees with you.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145129 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:18 pm to
sizable population of laker fans would
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

I assume you mean relevant, and I think it is. Maybe you're just pro-centric, but I think a football game that impacts the politics of a huge state is a testament to the magnitude of the rivalry.


So does a football game that impacts the politics of a state 6 times the size of Alabama make the Lone Star Showdown 6 times as big as the Iron Bowl?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108124 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

So does a football game that impacts the politics of a state 6 times the size of Alabama make the Lone Star Showdown 6 times as big as the Iron Bowl?


You're still completely missing the point. It's not the size but the intensity of the rivalry, hence my Hatfields and McCoys reference.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

I really don't see why the national relevance of a rivalry has to do with how great the rivalry is. Was the fact that the Hatfields and the McCoys didn't have statewide or national consequences make it not a great rivalry? You look at it on how each of the fanbases react to someone. A guy from LA is not going to give a frick if someone is from Boston. A guy from Columbus is going to have some strong prejudices against a guy from Ann Arbor though.


So what is the difference in hate between the Egg Bowl and the Iron Bowl? Or Packers/Vikings? National relevance makes a rivalry great because it brings in people to the rivalry that don't have the intense local reasons, and they are still on board anyway. I've traveled plenty of places all over this country, and people HATE the Dallas Cowboys. fricking hate us. Is it as intense as some Iron Bowl hate? No, but they haven't even stepped foot inside the Lone Star State sometimes, and they hate our fricking guts anyway. It's easy to hate something when it's obnoxiously in your face all the time, but that is not all that makes a rivalry.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44013 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:35 pm to
Which circles the discussion back to the fact that rivalries are important to those involved in them; ergo, Bama/Aub is the greatest rivalry in the eyes of Alabama folks. Oklahoma/Oke State is the greatest rivalry from an Okie perspective.

Bottom line: Rivalries are pretty great. No need to rank em.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

You're still completely missing the point. It's not the size but the intensity of the rivalry, hence my Hatfields and McCoys reference.


So does Baylor killing a cadet, and Aggie cadets commandeering a howitzer on a rail car in order to turn their campus in to rubble, only to be stopped by the Texas Rangers match anything as intense as the might Alabama/Auburn rivalry?
Posted by Hahawg
Member since Jan 2013
729 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 10:38 pm to
Behind India-Pakistan's cricket rivalry, Giants-Dodgers, Ohio State-Michigan, and others.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter