Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/5/14 at 5:41 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:no
A&M has a significantly better football history than South Carolina.
Posted on 6/5/14 at 6:04 am to abellsujr
What is obvious to me about that list is that we made "poor" choices when we expanded. Hell, one of them didn't even make the top 50.
This post was edited on 6/5/14 at 6:06 am
Posted on 6/5/14 at 6:23 am to Crimson G
Wisconsin is seriously #2 in total revenue? I never would've guessed that.
Posted on 6/5/14 at 7:24 am to Korin
quote:
Win the SECCG then.
Has anyone here ever done that? I mean, you are implying that cockyboi has control over that, correct? It's up to cockyboi to win the SECCG, amirite?
Owell, anyways, I was perusing that list and noticed ...
6 Florida - $130,011,244 - $106,972,983 - $4,444,513 - 3.42
158 Georgia Southern - $13,200,750 - $13,200,750 - $8,320,670 - 63.03
Why did you let that happen?
Posted on 6/5/14 at 7:30 am to Asharad
quote:
no
No we actually do. SC was Baylor before 2010.
Posted on 6/5/14 at 7:34 am to Asharad
quote:
not if we define "football history" to include only the last three seasons
FIFY.
But football history is also largely irrelevant. SCAR has a good program now, and that's what matters.
Posted on 6/5/14 at 7:43 am to Bamatab
yeah, I don't get how Wisconsin is so rich either...
Posted on 6/5/14 at 7:48 am to tiger perry
quote:
yeah, I don't get how Wisconsin is so rich either...
I stated that in the other thread on this, not sure where it went. They had a 40 mil spike in one year(since Bert Left) maybe they had a one time Revenue stream or something
Posted on 6/5/14 at 7:49 am to abellsujr
Brand value vs. what was actually earned a little different. I would be interested to know brand value for overall athletics since the OP is talking about revenue for all athletics at the school not just football.
Posted on 6/5/14 at 7:54 am to tiger perry
Remember the OP showed overall athletics not just football. What UA and AU fro example each have 15 varsity sports where Wisconsin has 23 varsity sports. 8 more teams to draw revenue from.
Posted on 6/5/14 at 7:56 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
They had a 40 mil spike in one year(since Bert Left) maybe they had a one time Revenue stream or something
there has to be a joke about money saved in food expenses in here somewhere.
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:01 am to TideWarrior
quote:
8 more teams to draw away revenue and create more expenses.
FIFY
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:07 am to piggidyphish
quote:
there has to be a joke about money saved in food expenses in here somewhere.
investment in to some buffet chains in arky
This post was edited on 6/5/14 at 8:08 am
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:13 am to Crimson G
Tennessee has potential to have #1 revenue in the near future. No other school in the SEC or entire nation has top 7 attendance for both Football AND Basketball. Attendance will go up even higher when UT starts winning.
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:20 am to Crimson G
But wait, didn't an Ole Miss poster say in a thread yesterday that Arkansas sucked at everything?
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:20 am to Phat Phil
quote:
Phat Phil
You people are delusional.
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:30 am to Gcockboi
quote:
I have no clue why you all act like their some power program.
But they BEAT Alabama that one time!
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:32 am to WonderWartHawg
quote:
But wait, didn't an Ole Miss poster say in a thread yesterday that Arkansas sucked at everything?
Ole Miss "good years" generally aren't much better than Arkansas "bad years".
Posted on 6/5/14 at 8:33 am to Bamatab
quote:
Wisconsin is seriously #2 in total revenue? I never would've guessed that.
Rather shocked at that myself. I would have guessed OSU or PSU
Page 2 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News