Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/17/13 at 3:54 pm to OBReb6
quote:
OBReb6
That picture doesnt show fricking anything that proves your point.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 3:55 pm to OBReb6
quote:
and his helmet is heading right for the neck area
wtf? That picture does not show that at all.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 3:56 pm to Funky Tide 8
Are you kidding me?
Posted on 11/17/13 at 3:57 pm to bmy
That's not when impact was made and it's clear from the angle shown in the OP. The recoil from the hit led to the receiver's head whipping into Jones' helmet. On the initial hit though Jones' head is off to the side.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 3:58 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Are you kidding me?
I'm wondering the same thing about you
First off, a still shot from a play like that isnt going to tell you anything, especially from that shitty angle.
Furthermore, it still shows Jones's helmet across the guys body, into his shoulder.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 3:59 pm to OBReb6
quote:
My picture is just before impact, and his helmet is heading right for the neck area
Really? Is that why it looks like he is sitting?
His body is behind his legs, the tops of his legs are almost parallel to the ground. That means it was post contact. You know, because when you're STANDING your body is straight over your legs.
This post was edited on 11/17/13 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 11/17/13 at 4:01 pm to Funky Tide 8
He violently hit him in the neck area with his helmet, y'all got away with it, congrats.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 4:02 pm to OBReb6
quote:
He violently hit him in the neck area with his helmet, y'all got away with it, congrats.
DAMN fine play by Jones. Great tackle.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 4:10 pm to OBReb6
quote:
He violently hit him in the neck area with his helmet, y'all got away with it, congrats.
post impact photo. nothing to get aways with. congrats for being a fricking idiot.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 4:12 pm to arrakis
Eheh, wtf was I, thinking?
Looking at the angles, it looked like two fouls could have been called. KCI and targeting. As fast as these guys move, it's a good thing they review the targeting part of these personal fouls. Looks like jones might have got away with both.
Looking at the angles, it looked like two fouls could have been called. KCI and targeting. As fast as these guys move, it's a good thing they review the targeting part of these personal fouls. Looks like jones might have got away with both.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 4:14 pm to TroyTider
nothing to get away with.
Ball hits kid in chest
Jones hits kid in chest
ball comes out
kid struggles to recognize anything and anyone around him.
Ball hits kid in chest
Jones hits kid in chest
ball comes out
kid struggles to recognize anything and anyone around him.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 4:14 pm to ThaKaptin
While I hate the targeting rule and think it's a pussy arse call, if they are going to call it they definitely should have called it there. In two weeks if Christian Jones gets knocked the frick out like that and there's no flag you will be raising hell, as you should be.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 4:24 pm to arrakis
quote:
You've obviously never read Rule 6-4-1...
KCI does not require a signal of any kind. In addition, there can be KCI without contact if the kicking team player is within the width of the receiver’s shoulders (to either side) or within one yard in front of the receiver.
When in question, it is a foul
During a free kick a player of the receiving team in position to receive the ball has the same kick-catch and fair-catch protection whether the ball is kicked directly off the tee or is immediately driven to the ground, strikes the ground once and goes into the air in the manner of the ball kicked directly off the tee.
I read it. Explain to me how you have KCI, on a kickoff, when there is no fair catch, because I didn't see it explained.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 4:37 pm to Alahunter
It was a kick off... just think of it as an onsides kick that landed at the ten yard line.
Its a free ball the same as if it only went 10 yards. I guess some here think you can fair catch an on sides kick and not get hit.
Its a free ball the same as if it only went 10 yards. I guess some here think you can fair catch an on sides kick and not get hit.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 4:38 pm to GoT1de
quote:
you can fair catch an on sides kick
You can. But he did no such thing.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 5:08 pm to GoT1de
Page 72 of the manual is helpful.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 5:17 pm to Alahunter
If the ball hits the ground first as this one did fair catch is meaningless.
Posted on 11/17/13 at 5:58 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
quote:
Does the targeting rule change for kickoffs?
No it just changes for bama
Posted on 11/17/13 at 5:58 pm to bbvdd
Why is everyone so obsessed with trying to make things targeting calls on bama. It's creepy. Also, does nobody appreciate a good hit anymore?
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News