Started By
Message
Richardson hype
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:48 am
I do not understand all the hype the bama fans are putting out in regards to TR. He had a total 700 yrds rushing on the year and only two 100 yrd games. His yards per carry was good, but against good teams he sucked. Ingram was by far the best back on that team.
16
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:50 am to Irons Puppet
frick you! he rules more than O'Doyle!
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:50 am to Irons Puppet
Our running game was subpar this year because of a couple reasons. Our OL did not play as well as previous years and we did not throw the ball deep enough. The hope for next year is more deep balls and better OL play.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:51 am to Irons Puppet
TR is much better than ingram IMO
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:51 am to Irons Puppet
Please please please tell me you're just flaming with this post. If you cannot see why Richardson is a beast, I don't know what to tell you.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:51 am to Irons Puppet
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:51 am to CrimsonTusk
Richardson and Ingram were also banged up for much of the season.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:52 am to CrimsonTusk
Richardson was hurt for 3 games too.
Late in the season, we didn't have all of our starting OL in till Michigan State
Late in the season, we didn't have all of our starting OL in till Michigan State
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:52 am to HottyToddy7
09 arkansas defense 
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:53 am to toomersdrugs
He is a good back. Not great. No hardware for him
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:54 am to Irons Puppet
I've heard that Richardson may be a little funny if you know what I mean.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:54 am to Irons Puppet
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:55 am to gatordmb89
quote:
Please please please tell me you're just flaming with this post. If you cannot see why Richardson is a beast, I don't know what to tell you.
He makes great highlight footage, but is not a consistant RB. He reminds me of some of the GA RBs that had all the potential but never developed. Maybe without Ingram he will shine.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:56 am to Irons Puppet
Richardson was injured throughout the season, he is the real deal. I thought Ingram's Heisman was a crock because he wasn't even the best RB on the team.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:57 am to Irons Puppet
Dude, he hasn't had the chance. Richardson hasn't been a feature back yet.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:58 am to Marines4Auburn
He was the feature back that season that dominated. Hard to argue with MI's Heisman.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 12:01 pm to Marines4Auburn
quote:
Richardson was injured throughout the season, he is the real deal. I thought Ingram's Heisman was a crock because he wasn't even the best RB on the team.
Richardson may have had more raw talent than Ingram had in 2009, but Richardson was by no means the better back that year. Ingram's vision and cut back abilities were vastly superior to those of Richardson. Ingram could also shed tacklers a little better than Richardson could.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 12:02 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
He was the feature back that season that dominated. Hard to argue with MI's Heisman.
Trent Richardson would probably have had the same season if not better.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 12:02 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
Dude, he hasn't had the chance. Richardson hasn't been a feature back yet.
My point is until he proves it on the field, don't make him out as the best back in the SEC. There are three returning backs who are proven feature backs.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 12:03 pm to RollTide1987
TR will scare the hell out of most defenses next year. He will be in the Heisman Trophy conversation again. If he didn't get banged up this year he would have been a favorite all year.
Page 1 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News