Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:21 pm to Warfarer
quote:
Dyer will get good numbers next year since the offense will shift back to what it looked like in 09 more than 10. We will have more of a running back oriented run offense next year with Dyer getting around 20 carries a game and McCalleb getting around 10 a game.
Dyer will hit a big number next year and if the line can gel early and stay healthy he will do well. You have to remember that while we have some tough games, we also have some comically stupid games.
So basically, you're "hyping" Dyer? You are going off assumptions, not facts, that sounds like hype...
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:21 pm to MagillaGuerilla
Yeah, this dude is failing, hard.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:21 pm to Warfarer
Now post where I said he was the best back in the country
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:24 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
So basically, you're "hyping" Dyer? You are going off assumptions, not facts, that sounds like hype...
Umm. Dyer ended the season with 1100 yards and was slowly turned into a feature back as the season progressed. That isn't hype, that is fact. Richardson is awesome because of how much weight he can lift and the fact that he hasn't had to prove that he can do it on the field. For two years, 90% of Bama fans have said that Richardson was better than Ingram, now it is time for him to prove it. But as of now, 700 yards a season is an above average back up running back, not this hype machine that should all of a sudden be thrusted into Heisman talks.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:28 pm to Warfarer
quote:
Umm. Dyer ended the season with 1100 yards and was slowly turned into a feature back as the season progressed. That isn't hype, that is fact. Richardson is awesome because of how much weight he can lift and the fact that he hasn't had to prove that he can do it on the field. For two years, 90% of Bama fans have said that Richardson was better than Ingram, now it is time for him to prove it. But as of now, 700 yards a season is an above average back up running back, not this hype machine that should all of a sudden be thrusted into Heisman talks.
You are assuming Auburn will shift the offense to feature him, you are assuming the offensive line will gel, you are assuming Dyer will get 1400 yards, you are assuming a lot.
Nothing of what you said is fact, you are hyping him. It's makes you no better than the people you are attempting to bash...
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:28 pm to Warfarer
quote:
For two years, 90% of Bama fans have said that Richardson was better than Ingram
Ok. You just just lost what ever arguement you might have had with that statement right there.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:28 pm to HighBrowCat
quote:
Teams keying on Cam and the O-line had a lot to do with Dyer and McCalleb's yards, IMHO. All a good RB needs is a step and the Cam threat was, certainly, worth a step or two.
Most of Dyer's yards were between the tackles, OM's were the result of run option that Auburn runs. Nodody was keying on Cam when Dyer got most of his yards.
This post was edited on 1/15/11 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:31 pm to Warfarer
quote:
Umm. Dyer ended the season with 1100 yards and was slowly turned into a feature back as the season progressed. That isn't hype, that is fact
So? There are a lot of factors that led him to gain those yards, factors which will not be there in 2011.
quote:
90% of Bama fans have said that Richardson was better than Ingram,
Okay, how many times am I going to have to call you a dumb arse?
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:32 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Nodody was key on Cam when Dyer got most of his yards.
U R dumb. Furthermore, he got most of his carries/yards in the second half when the defense was worn down from Cam.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:32 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
Ok. You just just lost what ever arguement you might have had with that statement right there.
So you are saying that this hasn't been beaten to death for the past two years? You are a liar then. Every time I have logged onto any site that has Bama fans involved, they have always assured me that Richardson was better.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:34 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
So basically, you're "hyping" Dyer? You are going off assumptions, not facts, that sounds like hype...
I'm not saying Dyer is the best back in the SEC. I think that title belongs to Lattimore followed by Davis. As it stands now I would have Dyer third and TR fourth.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:34 pm to Irons Puppet
Why was Bo Jackson so hyped when he was with the Raiders? He never rushed for 1000 yards. He rushed for more than 700 yards only once. His career high in rushing TDs is five. He never finished top 10 in the NFL in rushing yards or TDs. What made him so great?
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:35 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
As it stands now I would have Dyer third and TR fourth.
You are a fricking moron.
/thread
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:36 pm to Irons Puppet
dyer is a great back, no doubt about it. but trent r. will be the main back at ala this year, look for a huge increase in production from him...
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:36 pm to BamaFan89
quote:
That's a big fricking if.
It is a big if, but very doable. While we aren't returning but 1 starter, our backups are there and will be the ones stepping up. Offensive line has been my biggest concern since 2009, Tubs left us in very bad shape on the line and our big line recruiting class last year had the rug pulled out from under it. Gayden left and Coleman wasn't able to make it.
The class that was supposed to be our buffer next year just isn't there so there will have to be people step up, but we have good coaches and good talent there.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:37 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
I'm not saying Dyer is the best back in the SEC. I think that title belongs to Lattimore followed by Davis. As it stands now I would have Dyer third and TR fourth.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:37 pm to Warfarer
quote:
So you are saying that this hasn't been beaten to death for the past two years? You are a liar then. Every time I have logged onto any site that has Bama fans involved, they have always assured me that Richardson was better.
No. Those were Auburn and LSU fans claiming Richardson was better as a way to discredit Ingram's Heisman. "He wasn't even the best HB on his team."
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:39 pm to Warfarer
quote:
but we have good coaches and good talent there.
So does Alabama but you saw how much our OL fell off this year.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 1:39 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
U R dumb. Furthermore, he got most of his carries/yards in the second half when the defense was worn down from Cam.
You do not understand that offense. On those wide sweeps the QB uses the handoff option based on reads. In Dyers case those were mostly strainght handoffs. Get a clue you DA.
Page 5 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News