Started By
Message

re: Ranking the BCS Champions from the SEC

Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:45 pm to
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42558 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:45 pm to
Lulz at all the gumps.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25092 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

and most of those teams lost games.



The East was down in 2010. Auburn got a flawed USC twice (they beat Bama so people overrate them) and Georgia was deplorable 6-7 (3-5). Kentucky was bad too at 6-7 (2-6). Bizarre year for the conference. Great offense on the 2010 team. Pretty decent against the run though those numbers were helped by an offensive juggernaut on the other side.
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

2004 Auburn barely beat 2004 LSU. I think the 2007 team could have really challenged them, probably even won the game on the road.
2007 LSU barely beat 2007 Auburn (lost to South Florida & MSU, at home). I think the 2004 team could have really blown them out, even in BR.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

and most of those teams lost games.


Neat
Posted by Crimson06
Tours
Member since Jan 2012
571 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

should have, would have, could have
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

2010 Auburn would wreck 2012 Alabama


Umm, 2010 Auburn didn't even wreck 2010 Bama, and that team lost to Steven Garcia.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25092 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

I think the 2004 team could have really blown them out, even in BR.


I don't think so. They were a great team, but Auburn hasn't blown out LSU in a long, long time. Highly unlikely. Would be a great game, though.
Posted by FourThreeForty
Member since May 2013
17290 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:47 pm to
10/10




Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
52279 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

People ranking 2008 Florida 4th or worse are seriously underrating just how good that team was on both sides of the ball.


I'm shocked honestly.

Do people forget how much NFL talent was on that team?
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:48 pm to
Not really sure why 1998 Tennessee is so far down everybody's list.
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13848 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:48 pm to
1) 2003 LSU
2) 2007 LSU
3) 1998 Tennessee
4) 2008 Florida
5) 2006 Florida
6) 2010 Auburn
7) 2012 Bama
8) 2009 Bama
9) 2011 Bama
Posted by Bama54
Neverland
Member since Nov 2011
5021 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Isn't this week the big rival game for y'all?



We play the piggies this week, hardly a rival.
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

you're dumber than shite. that team was loaded on both sides of the ball.


So were all the other teams on the list except 98 UT.



Yep. That team got by on grit and effort. Only 32 future NFL players on the roster.

LINK
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 4:50 pm
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25092 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Not really sure why 1998 Tennessee is so far down everybody's list.


Because Clint Stoerner was the MVP of that team.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Because Clint Stoerner was the MVP of that team.



And that somehow makes them worse than a team that lost to Kentucky and Arkansas?
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Because Clint Stoerner was the MVP of that team.



Yeah, they almost lost a game to a top 10 team but they didn't. What about teams that lost multiple games, including a game to an unranked opponent at home?
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25092 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:52 pm to
It doesn't bother me where you rank LSU's national championship teams. It bothers you that your team isn't well thought of because Arkansas Arkansas'd.
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11913 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

1) 2003 LSU
2) 2007 LSU
3) 1998 Tennessee
4) 2008 Florida
5) 2006 Florida
6) 2010 Auburn
7) 2012 Bama
8) 2009 Bama












9) 2011 Bama


Nice list with a little work.

Not sure why you have Bama 2011 listed at all though

You have to at least win your division to be considered a champion of anything, right?
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13848 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

You have to at least win your division to be considered a champion of anything, right?

I had to list them. Didn't want to appear as though I was denying the truth (that Bama's best team in the history if their program couldn't beat Jordan Jefferson in Bryant-Denny)
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 10/17/13 at 4:55 pm to
LOL at the idea that 2010 Auburn would "wreck" anybody, they scrapped by Clemson, Kentucky, South Carolina, LSU, Alabama, and Oregon.

Almost all championship teams have that 1 game they pull out of the fire or scrap by, but Auburn 2010 did it every week.

People are being WAY too results oriented. Sometimes great teams lose games, sometimes bad teams win games. There's way too much focus on final record.

I get that's what it's all about at the end of the day, but there's this thing called variance.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter