Started By
Message
re: Name the jobs that are better than LSU
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:22 pm to WilliamTaylor21
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:22 pm to WilliamTaylor21
LSU is in the 5-10 range, where exactly doesn't really matter. The question isn't whether LSU can attract a really good coach. The questions are will the admin make a good choice, and then give him everything he needs and stay the hell out of the way. And I think that is the great unknown.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:23 pm to WilliamTaylor21
Florida and Oklahoma are probably on the same level as the ones the OP listed. I think LSU is easily a Top 10 job. Also think any of the Top 10 are interchangeable depending on the prospective coach.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:23 pm to WilliamTaylor21
Other than maybe
Florida
Meh Oregon
Fl State
Stanford
I'd really put LSU equal to Oregon and Stanford but no, LSU is up there.
Florida
Meh Oregon
Fl State
Stanford
I'd really put LSU equal to Oregon and Stanford but no, LSU is up there.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:23 pm to bmy
quote:
Thanks to their academic standards their recruiting is crap now.
According to 24/7, they had the 13th ranked class last year. Yeah, that's crap. They're practically Rutgers at this point.
This post was edited on 9/26/16 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:24 pm to Camel Menthol
quote:
It sure paints Aggies as a bunch of absolute fools though when you let it happen like that. But that is Aggy
No.
The A&M job is one of the top jobs. If we need to make a change, we will attract the top talent to fill the position.
Anyone with any business experience knows this is the right way to handle it.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:24 pm to Camel Menthol
Meh things change over time. Minnesota is a great example, they aren't a top 30 job today but they are a top 30 program for another 50 years at least.
I would rather be A&M with a shitty history but a lot of kickass advantages in the now than a Minnesota who has all these titles from a dynasty I never saw.
We live in the now and so do coaches.
I would rather be A&M with a shitty history but a lot of kickass advantages in the now than a Minnesota who has all these titles from a dynasty I never saw.
We live in the now and so do coaches.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:24 pm to CajunBattles
quote:
USC is great on scenery, but how much winning are they doing as of late? How's their rank in recruiting? USC is tradition, and some kids don't care about that.
Notre Dame is another one based on tradition, but look at the program in recent years.
Everyone said the same thing about Alabama in 2006. The brand and tradition of USC/Notre Dame + an elite coach will equal winning and much more favorable situations than the majority of colleges including LSU
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:24 pm to texag7
All of these are better jobs than A&M bud
1. Alabama
2. Ohio State
3. Michigan
4. Texas
5. USC
6. Notre Dame
7. LSU
8.Florida
9. Georgia
10. Oklahoma
11. Tennessee
12. Florida State
13. UCLA
And Michigan State/Miami type schools could debate being above A&M... so yeah, A&M is around 16-20
1. Alabama
2. Ohio State
3. Michigan
4. Texas
5. USC
6. Notre Dame
7. LSU
8.Florida
9. Georgia
10. Oklahoma
11. Tennessee
12. Florida State
13. UCLA
And Michigan State/Miami type schools could debate being above A&M... so yeah, A&M is around 16-20
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:25 pm to WilliamTaylor21
I don't think USC, Michigan, or Notre Dame are better than LSU. Definitely not Oklahoma or A&M.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:25 pm to KaiserSoze99
Arkansas is a better job than LSU, better administration to work for, realistic expectations, ample budget for the staffs. This is why Arkansas has been able to snag the big fish that has turned down "better jobs" continually over the years.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:25 pm to WilliamTaylor21
Better job or better program?
You don't seem to understand the difference.
You don't seem to understand the difference.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:25 pm to WilliamTaylor21
Jesus Miami? Weak bait. We are top 15, next on your list.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:26 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Arkansas is a better job than LSU, better administration to work for, realistic expectations, ample budget for the staffs. This is why Arkansas has been able to snag the big fish that has turned down "better jobs" continually over the years.
I agree with this.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:27 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
The A&M job is one of the top jobs.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:27 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
LSU is in the 5-10 range, where exactly doesn't really matter. The question isn't whether LSU can attract a really good coach. The questions are will the admin make a good choice, and then give him everything he needs and stay the hell out of the way. And I think that is the great unknown.
Agreed
Trolls just keep insisting LSU isn't a top job, wanted to know what is haha!
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:28 pm to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
Trolls just keep insisting LSU isn't a top job, wanted to know what is haha!
Yeah! You tell us!!
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:28 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
I agree with this.
Thanks! Trying to get a list of idiots on this board, you made the list for saying Arkansas is a better job than LSU. Congrats
Posted on 9/26/16 at 7:28 pm to SDVTiger
Where else can a coach recruit within driving distance, have unmatched facilities, get 5 mill a year to be okay, and NOT get fired at the beginning of the season for two loses that could have gone either way?
LSU is NOT a top job. A&M is much better.
LSU is NOT a top job. A&M is much better.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News