Started By
Message
re: Mark my words, Bama is still going to be National Champions
Posted on 11/18/11 at 10:02 am to Fat Bastard
Posted on 11/18/11 at 10:02 am to Fat Bastard
I claim 12. The NCAA recognizes AP/UPI/BCS which Bama has 8 (eat it bitches). Nothing anyone can do to change that, no matter how much the jealous SEC teams that Bama has owned over the years try.
Plus the 4 Rose Bowl Championships. Sorry for the SEC teams that never could nor never will be able to claim one.
Plus the 4 Rose Bowl Championships. Sorry for the SEC teams that never could nor never will be able to claim one.
0
Posted on 11/18/11 at 10:39 am to Tha Truth
41 is bogus. 73 and 78 are AP titles. Hard to argue with that regardless of the logic used. Unless the AP or BCS grants Bama the 2011 title, you won't see any banner. Nice flame.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 10:46 am to RollTide1987
quote:
You mad, bro?
I don't think anyone is mad. It's called mockery. All the other schools are making fun of Bama. Bama is like the kid in elementary school who thinks the participation ribbon means he actually won something. That kid always got made fun of. That is Bama when they claim some of these ridiculous NCs. I LOVE that Bama claims those. Gives us something real to point and laugh at. So, yea, not mad at all. Quite pleased and entertained by it all.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:35 am to FleshEatingSalsa
If it is just like in 2003 we will claim half of it just to make you mad!
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:36 am to ScoopAndScore
Only 1941 is really that bad.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:11 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
And FWIW, the 1978 USC win in B'ham vs Bama was as fluky as they come. E.g., 2 Bama defenders, each in perfect position to intercept a pass, collide tipping the ball to an SC receiver who runs 50-60 yds for a TD, etc. That SC team wouldn't have beaten Bama again in 4 or 5 consecutive tries. Bama was without question the better team that year.
This is the purist illustration of "BammerTard" that one can find: USC's win at Bammer in 78 was "as fluky as they come" and thus should be discounted.
Just like LSU's 2011 victory over Bammer in Tuscaloosa is to be dismissed because Bammer "beat themselves" and LSU "did nothing".
I see how it works now.
Bama is dismissed. Discussion and analysis is completed. Bama has Four Legit NCs.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:12 pm to dkreller
Arkansas' gonna beat Oregon in the NC 52-38
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:14 pm to Wildhog
LSU will lose to the Hogs 28-34.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:14 pm to Wildhog
OU will beat OSU 89-88
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:14 pm to Wildhog
I changed my mind. We beat OU in the NC.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:15 pm to Wildhog
In Dreams, you are mine. All of the time.
-- Roy Orbison
-- Roy Orbison
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:19 pm to Champagne
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
-Albert Einstein
-Albert Einstein
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:28 pm to Champagne
quote:
Bama has Four Legit NCs
Wrong. Try again
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:35 pm to Champagne
quote:
Champagne
quote:Pfsssst . . . . I'm not a bammer.
This is the purist illustration of "BammerTard" that one can find
quote:Pfsssst . . . . I didn't say it should be discounted.
USC's win at Bammer in 78 was "as fluky as they come" and thus should be discounted.
I said Bama deserved their ranking after all was said and done.
USC subsequently lost to ASU, ended the regular season ranked #3. They went into the Bowls ranked behind #2 Alabama and #1 Penn State and received a gift in the RoseBowl vs #5 UofM. #2 Bama beat #1 Penn State in the SugarBowl. USC still jumped them in one of the two polls.
ETA: Worth noting -- the previous year (1977) #5 ND had beaten #1Texas in the Cotton, while #2Bama destroyed #9OhioState in the Sugar. ND jumped Bama in the final rankings and was declared consensus #1 because they had beaten the #1 ranked team. Bama only received half that consideration in 1978.
This post was edited on 11/18/11 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:39 pm to NC_Tigah
Y'all are still arguing over this shite?
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:42 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
received a gift in the RoseBowl vs #5 UofM. #2 Bama
Not sure if serious
The Rose Bowl matches the PAC10 champion against the Big 10 champion. There was no choice in the matter. Sugar could have taken a team other than Penn State though...
Posted on 11/18/11 at 1:48 pm to Tha Truth
quote:The gift was the horrid call resulting in a touchdown (referenced earlier) against UofM that USC never actually scoredquote:Not sure if serious
eceived a gift in the RoseBowl vs #5 UofM. #2 Bama
Posted on 11/18/11 at 2:07 pm to Champagne
quote:No matter how many times you say this, facts are facts. Bama has 8 AP/UPI/BCS titles.
Bama is dismissed. Discussion and analysis is completed. Bama has Four Legit NCs.
How long will it take for LSU to get 8 titles? How many have you got now.... 3? Even if LSU wins one this year, you'll still only have half of what Bama has. So learn to live with it.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 2:11 pm to Tha Truth
quote:
Mark my words
stopped reading right there
Posted on 11/18/11 at 3:00 pm to elposter
quote:
1941 is ridiculous, agreed
There goes the credibility!
Page 8 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News