Started By
Message
re: Best SEC Defenses/Offenses of last 5 years
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:03 am to RB10
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:03 am to RB10
You conveniently left off the woodshed beating LSU endured on the sport's biggest stage.
Yes.
Again, yes. Those crystal footballs trump anything accomplished in the regular season.
If you want to limit the resumes to regular season only, then I can agree with you.
quote:
So FSU's 2013 resume is better than LSU's 2011?
Yes.
quote:
BTW, by your standards LSU's 2007 resume, which had 2 losses to unranked teams, is better than the 2011 resume
Again, yes. Those crystal footballs trump anything accomplished in the regular season.
If you want to limit the resumes to regular season only, then I can agree with you.
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 11:09 am
1
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:09 am to Spread
I'm done arguing with you. The fact that you can't rectify that a resume is not solely determined by one game speaks volumes to your mental capacity.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:17 am to RB10
The resumes I am talking about are not "solely determined by one game."
To get to the BCS natty a team had to have beaten a lot of teams to get there, and been considered one of the two best teams in the nation. Winning the national championship is the greatest accomplishment a team can aspire to.
I guess this is the difference in Bama and LSU fans - we measure success by national championships, while you claim "resume moral victories."
To get to the BCS natty a team had to have beaten a lot of teams to get there, and been considered one of the two best teams in the nation. Winning the national championship is the greatest accomplishment a team can aspire to.
I guess this is the difference in Bama and LSU fans - we measure success by national championships, while you claim "resume moral victories."
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 11:19 am
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:20 am to Spread
quote:
The resumes I am talking about are not "solely determined by one game
It's actually exactly what you're saying.
You're claiming that NC winners have inherently better resumes, no matter what, over non-NC winners, because of one game.
I'm sorry you're too stupid to realize this.
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 11:21 am
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:26 am to RB10
quote:
You're claiming that NC winners have inherently better resumes, no matter what, over non-NC winners, because of one game.
A team doesn't just happen to get invited to the BCS natty, they had to have had one of the two most successful seasons up to that point TO GET TO THE NATTY. So it's not just about the championship game itself - although it is THE most important single game (by far) of the entire season.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:30 am to Spread
quote:
A team doesn't just happen to get invited to the BCS natty, they had to have had one of the two most successful seasons up to that point TO GET TO THE NATTY. So it's not just about the championship game itself - although it is THE most important single game (by far) of the entire season
None of this disputes the fact that your idea of a better resume is based on one game, and your belief that FSU's 2013 is better than LSU's 2011 proves it.
Like I said, your inability to differentiate between a good resume and a national title is astounding, and I'm done arguing with you.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:37 am to RB10
quote:
your inability to differentiate between a good resume and a national title
I never said LSU 2011 didn't have a "good" resume, I'm simply saying it isn't anywhere close to the GOAT when the whole season is taken into consideration.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:37 am to SummerOfGeorge
Missouri defense could have made that list also.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 11:39 am to CrimsonChin
quote:
2011 Bama defense.....goat.
2001 Miami laughs at you
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:15 pm to Spread
quote:
I never said LSU 2011 didn't have a "good" resume, I'm simply saying it isn't anywhere close to the GOAT when the whole season is taken into consideration.
Don't even bother. They made rings for finishing #2.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:16 pm to Korin
Touche 
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:24 pm to Spread
And also make rings for division titles when they didn't even play in the SECCG. Can't say shite to Ole Miss.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:33 pm to Bmath
quote:
Call me a homer, but I maintain that the 2011 LSU defense was better.
Im not being a Homer. Compare the schedules and offenses each team.played in 11. No fricking way in hell Bama's defense was better than ours with the schedule we played.
Oregon, West Va.,Nw st, western Kentucky
Kent st, Penn st, north texas, GA southern.
One is not the same
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:46 pm to Korin
Now that's funny right there, I don't care who you are
Posted on 12/17/14 at 9:20 pm to Ash'sProstheticHand
quote:
You sound like an idiot. That offense featured two offensive lineman, a wide receiver, two tight ends, and a rb that were drafted... in the first round. They scored over 40 6x, over 50 3x, and over 60 twice. That was an elite offense.
and a qb that was runner up(or maybe 3rd place) in the heisman.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 10:17 pm to RB10
quote:
None of this disputes the fact that your idea of a better resume is based on one game, and your belief that FSU's 2013 is better than LSU's 2011 proves it.
Like I said, your inability to differentiate between a good resume and a national title is astounding, and I'm done arguing with you.
While I disagree with him in principle, you have to admit that, in the long run, nobody remembers who came in second, or who played the hardest schedule. They remember who the national champion was.
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 10:18 pm
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News