Started By
Message

re: AP Releases it's top 100 CBB programs of all time

Posted on 3/30/17 at 9:41 pm to
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 3/30/17 at 9:41 pm to
Kentucky









Arkansas, Florida

LSU

everyone else
Posted by HogFanfromHTown
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2015
3597 posts
Posted on 3/31/17 at 9:21 am to
quote:


1. Kentucky
2. UNC
3. Duke
4. UCLA
5. Kansas

List is obviously shite since UCLA is not #1
quote:

29. Missouri
30. Alabama
31. Arkansas

so 0 Final fours> 6 Final Fours. 6 Elite Eight combined between two schools> 10 by one. Clearly whoever made this is a colossal idiot.
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 3/31/17 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Kentucky Arkansas, Florida LSU everyone else


+1
Posted by Glory, Glory
Pawleys Island, SC
Member since Nov 2012
4498 posts
Posted on 3/31/17 at 11:38 am to
UGA is a rather shitty at basketball, but what has Auburn, A&M or SCAR accomplished to be rated that much higher than Georgia?
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
7797 posts
Posted on 3/31/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

29. Missouri
30. Alabama
31. Arkansas


quote:

yeah, didn't run the Mizzou numbers but Arkansas nearly triples Bama in every major category.


The numbers here are historical ranking points in the AP poll.

That metric is limited as it does not consider NCAA titles, Final Fours ect and those are, ultimately, what everyone wants to achieve.

In that regard Arkansas is clearly a step above Alabama historically and most would also trade LSU's final fours and superstar alumni in their feast or famine past for Alabama's steady history.

However, instead of simply saying "this ranking doesn't show what it was not intended to show", there is something interesting to glean about what it does show.

Regarding Alabama, it reveals that the basketball program has been consistently pretty damn good over the long term to compile so many AP ranking points --during periods when southern, like western, teams probably got less poll consideration than those in the east and midwest as well-- and has done without many high point seasons of being ranked in the top 5.

Probably also means that the program has really underachieved historically on the biggest stage since even sheer luck would say that if a program has that many Top25 teams the odds are fairly low that a couple don't win a few more games in the tourney.


Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 9Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter