Started By
Message
re: Welfare. Discussion starts here, let's see where it takes us.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:28 am to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:28 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
I met 3 government employees in Florence today who have kids on Medicaid.
Having kids on medicaid always made sense to me. Even if they don't qualify, there is always SCHIP(Bush signed this in to law).
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:29 am to The Spleen
quote:
Have a link to the article then?
The map that I saw didn't have an article with it, which is why I didn't link it originally. This is where it further links you to though...
LINK
quote:
Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2011, between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and other benefits, the average U.S. household below the poverty line received $168.00 a day in government support. What’s the problem with that much support? Well, the median household income in America is just over $50,000, which averages out to $137.13 a day. To put it another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for a 40-hour week, while the average job pays $25.00 an hour.
So I guess it does state that the benefits are going to "U.S. household below the poverty line", doesn't make the point any less valid.
Minimum wage nets you 15k+, which is above the "poverty line" I believe, but I could be wrong.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:30 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I believe in social safety nets. I don't agree with welfare's current form. I don't agree with food stamps being a blank debit card you can use however you choose. I don't agree with welfare making people comfortable. I think the epidemic of overspending doesn't need to start with addressing welfare, but I think it should get there eventually. There are much bigger problems than the overspending relating to welfare. I essentially disagree with the arguments presented by both sides.
Agree with most of this. Welfare is vitally important in a civilized society. There are many problems with it right now that need addressing, but I get really riled up when people vilify welfare recipients as the problem.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:30 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
mandatory drug testing for all welfare participents should be the norm.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:32 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I believe in social safety nets. I don't agree with welfare's current form. I don't agree with food stamps being a blank debit card you can use however you choose. I don't agree with welfare making people comfortable.
Agreed.
quote:
I think the epidemic of overspending doesn't need to start with addressing welfare, but I think it should get there eventually. There are much bigger problems than the overspending relating to welfare. I essentially disagree with the arguments presented by both sides.
I guess one of the main reasons that it is brought up so often is the fact that it stares us all in the face almost daily. A lot of americans do not understand the intricacies of the government's budget, but understand that welfare is a giant frick up.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:33 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
mandatory drug testing for all welfare participents should be the norm.
Florida tried this and it turned into a colossal waste of money, and didn't really have an impact. I think the courts even ruled it unconstitutional.
I don't disagree with the idea of it though, but offer drug counseling while receiving the benefits or something.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:34 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
What? You don't seriously believe this, do you?
It was more of a joke.
You see people saying this type of ratchet shite all the time.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:36 am to The Spleen
quote:
I get really riled up when people vilify welfare recipients as the problem.
Whose vilifying them? The system is a giant clusterfrick. While I think it is completely unethical to take advantage of it, it's the government's fault it is the way it is.
To tout it as a campaigning ploy as discussed earlier is even more unethical IMO.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:37 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
It was more of a joke.
You see people saying this type of ratchet shite all the time.
Okay just making sure.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:40 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
So I guess it does state that the benefits are going to "U.S. household below the poverty line", doesn't make the point any less valid.
I saw you left out the first line in that link, which solidifies my point.
quote:
These 11 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:42 am to The Spleen
quote:
That is such a misleading title. A good many people on welfare do work, they just work crappy jobs that don't pay well.
The average poor household has about 1/2 FTE in work hours per year according to the BOL. So, no, they're not usually working.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:44 am to DynastyDawg
Mississippi is supposed to implement the drug testing system soon I believe.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:45 am to The Spleen
quote:
I saw you left out the first line in that link, which solidifies my point.quote:
These 11 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!
Dude that's the fricking first line of the OP.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:47 am to OBReb6
quote:
Mississippi is supposed to implement the drug testing system soon I believe.
Yeah but I want to say I read up about it when that was first announced and it is a complete load of shite. It's not really going to do anything, it's just going to be there so that they can say, "look at us we did it."
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:49 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
Whose vilifying them?
Republican lawmakers and politicians, right-wing blogs, Fox News, etc.
Guys like Rep. Stephen Fincher from Tennessee that has received millions in farm subsidies.
LINK
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:50 am to the808bass
what do you guys think of drug testing welfare recipients?
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:52 am to The Spleen
I don't have a problem with vilifying people who are able to work and game the system instead.
I don't have a problem vilifying the rich who game the system either.
It's why villifying exists. It's useful.
I don't have a problem vilifying the rich who game the system either.
It's why villifying exists. It's useful.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:52 am to extremelsu
Worthless. I get the impulse. But it's a loser on a return-on-investment basis.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:55 am to DynastyDawg
quote:
11 States That Have More People On Welfare Than Working
bullshite.
Unless they are counting SS and Medicare as welfare, which would make the finding actively deceptive. Good start.
quote:
Total number of Americans on food stamps 46,700,000
That's roughly 15 percent of the population.
I'd agree that's a troubling figure. The question though is why?
I believe the ballooning of those numbers has quite a bit to do with the recession and fallout from it. It's been stagnant at the bottom and food prices aren't getting lower. You can thank Ethanol subsidies for that. There's actually a decent argument that ethanol subsidies were a major player in the recession, but that's for another topic another day.
Through that line of reasoning, I believe welfare numbers to be more of a barometer of how the economy is for the lower classes. It's still not very good.
quote:
Number of U.S. States where Welfare pays more than the average salary of a U.S. Teacher 8
That's a horrifying statistic.
quote:
At the end of 2011, the last year for which data are available, some 108.6 million people received one or more means-tested government benefit programs — bureaucratese for welfare. Meanwhile, there were just 101.7 million people with full-time jobs, the Census data show, including both the private and government sectors.
I want to see how they get those numbers for full time work. Remember that isn't counting old people and students/children. Yet they would be counted for people receiving a benefit. It's not a straight apples to apples comparison. Again, the numbers are a bit misleading.
Still, it's a high number of people receiving benefits. Most of that was from Medicaid and SNAP. Which should be no surprise.
I think Welfare is too hyper-politicized. It's just another issue to keep us fighting with each other. More sinister, it shines a light into the bad side of greed that drives our economy. Can't let people who need help have some of MY money! At the same time abuse of the system is a drain on the economy and gives the other side all the more reason to rail against it. It's really just a symptom of the larger problems within our economy.
Cutting obstructive government regulations, a focus on education, actual healthcare reform (not insurance reform a la Obamacare), getting rid of the Ethanol subsidies, ect. to shape a healthier economy will lower our costs on these transfer payments. It's much easier to bitch about welfare queens and propose cutting welfare than to actually think about and work on the problems at hand.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News