Started By
Message

re: True or False: Religious topic

Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:45 pm to
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:45 pm to
You conniving bastard
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28872 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

False. We would have just found something else to kill each other over



Word.

Religion of any sort has fostered much more good than bad. There are some crappy people in any religion, but to think that the bad outweighs the good is foolhearty.

Unless we're just talking about one religion in particular.
Posted by Kodar
Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
4558 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Religion of any sort has fostered much more good than bad. There are some crappy people in any religion, but to think that the bad outweighs the good is foolhearty.

Unless we're just talking about one religion in particular.

Paging V&S.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28872 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:52 pm to
Shhhh. You're exposing my hook too much.
Posted by BamaChemE
Midland, TX
Member since Feb 2012
7140 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:53 pm to
False. Even if
quote:

Religion has caused more wars and death than anything else in the history of mankind.


the technological advancements from those wars have made life a hell of a lot easier and allow more people to live today than at any point possible in the past. Or if you're in favor of population control, wars killed off a lot of people so that the resources didn't get used before we were here.


People as a whole are greedy, self-serving bastards. Individually, we try to rise above that, but the fact is wars and crap would happen regardless. If we're just talking about any religion in general, it gives people the structure they desire to try to not be as shitty as they may otherwise be.

Like Voltaire said, "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent Him."

Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Unless we're just talking about one religion in particular.





Scientology?
Posted by Kodar
Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
4558 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:54 pm to
False: Human nature is sinful. Wars would be fought regardless. Even some of the wars that were supposedly over religion had some ulterior motive. I can't think of a single war that was simply over religion.

Additionally, government is responsible for far more death and destruction. That could be further projected onto atheism. Stalin ring a bell?
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20497 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

Religion has caused more wars and death than anything else in the history of mankind.




Yeah, that's not even close to true...
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28872 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 6:05 pm to
It's catfan having to defend a religion outside of Islam.

Just say "shut up catfan" and move on.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

True. Religion has caused more wars and death than anything else in the history of mankind.





This is the dumbest thing you've posted since you posted


quote:

Kentucky football will be just fine





Callate El Gato fanatica
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 6:24 pm to
false
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

I know it's a hypothetical, but I dislike the premise. Why has humanity been religious across culture and time?


Approximately 60,000 years ago, fully modern humans, Homo sapiens sapiens, appeared. The hallmark of this modernism was creativity. Symbolism was the product of this new power of creativity.

Coincidental with the origin of modern humans were proto-religious practices. Dead members of primitive tribes were buried along with items signifying their respect by survivors. Paintings in caves represented reverence for the prey that sustained the groups.

No doubt, IMO, this new love for and use of symbolism extended to the command structure within the tribes. Where raw power was necessary to maintain leadership prior to this evolutionary bellwether of symbolism, now a leader could establish a mystical entity that was all-powerful and demanded obedience to rules that were passed down only through the tribal leader(s). The original shamans were born.

So, true, we'd be a far less deceitful species without shamans.
This post was edited on 2/20/15 at 5:20 am
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95902 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 6:40 pm to
Easily true. Religion has set us back generations.
Posted by JordonfortheJ
Bavaria-Germany
Member since Mar 2012
14547 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

Humanity would have been better off today if religion had never been created.


False.

The world is better off with people who have their own set of beliefs they live by, some good some may not be.

Posted by derSturm37
Texas
Member since May 2013
1521 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Humanity would have been better off today if religion had never been created.

True or False?

False. Very False.

SADLY, very False.

This would make for a great psychological profile question. Not because it measures someone's religiosity but because it exposes the limits of a person's perspective. His/her historical perspective. His/her perspective of self relative The Universe.

To "thinking" people who nonetheless rarely think about the fact that they are temporary place-markers on a planet that has supported man for ages it should definitely seem that the answer is "True". If the world had begun in The Middle Ages then: Yeah. We'd be better off without it. But the world for man began with man scratching his unwiped furry anus on a tree trunk. Religion helped us to rise out from the mud and build houses, schools, and windmills. Without it we might all yet be crawling around braining one another with sticks and dying of old age at 30.

Too many modern Americans I fear have lost their historical perspective. They spend too many hours in cars during rush hour. They don't realize that a mere 100 years ago most of us were driving around on animals. 200 years ago there was no Environmentalism because Nature was still kicking our arse! Keeping your yard mowed was a literal struggle and you were always losing. 2000 years ago Europeans were living like fricking monkeys. The Jesus Myth [and all the crap that came with it] facilitated social evolution, like it or not.

The Universe is more complicated than any child would have it to be. Religion had its place. It was needed. It served Man. It was good. We've reached the point now whereby it is arcane. Doubtful we COULD have reached this point save via it.

The answer is "False". A reluctant "False".

The Labor Unions were great in their day, also. They helped engender a world wherein they had to eat themselves.
Posted by bawbarn
Member since Jul 2012
3695 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:31 pm to
False. Genghis Kahn didn't do anything in the name of religion and he killed up to 70,000,000 people.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:33 pm to
Trite beyond imagination.

And wrong.
Posted by CheeseburgerEddie
Crimson Tide Fan Club
Member since Oct 2012
15574 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:36 pm to
False
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:39 pm to
The number of words in your response implies succinctness. However, the content of the response implies ignorance.

ETA: Oh, and welcome back. Missed you.
This post was edited on 2/19/15 at 9:44 pm
Posted by derSturm37
Texas
Member since May 2013
1521 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

False. Genghis Kahn didn't do anything in the name of religion and he killed up to 70,000,000 people.


1) You're saying that because "things" besides religions do bad things then relgions are not a bad things? So I can tell my 3 year-old: "Hippoptami kill people, too, and so your drinking that bleach wouldn't be ill advised."

2) You imply that killing people is a bad thing. From whence this notion that homicide is bad?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter