Started By
Message
re: People who don't vaccinate their children are...
Posted on 4/16/15 at 11:52 pm to hipgnosis
Posted on 4/16/15 at 11:52 pm to hipgnosis
quote:
It's significant regardless of the ratios.
The size of my house is significant in relation to the plot of land it is on. However, Hawaii is insignificant in relation to the Pacific Ocean.
It is insignificant on the scale being discussed.
quote:
Vaccines are a growing player for the coming years. People with vision know this.
Vaccine revenues have been declining as a percent of total pharm revenue since 1994.
quote:
You keep ignoring the potential for massive growth once there are mandates for vaccines around every corner. Wonder why that is.
There is no potential for massive growth in vaccine revenues as a percent of pharm revenue.
This post was edited on 4/16/15 at 11:53 pm
1
Posted on 4/17/15 at 8:48 am to Roger Klarvin
Hipgnosis is very obviously delusional. He keeps arguing with me on the Mizzou board in the most stupid way. Just one of those people who will never accept realities.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 8:54 am to 5thTiger
No one is sure you're a good judge of reality. But we appreciate all viewpoints.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 9:16 am to the808bass
quote:
No one is sure you're a good judge of reality.
Pretty sure I see reality just fine. I appreciate different viewpoints, even when I have a differing opinion. For example, I enjoy the discussion on gun control. Both sides have legitimate arguments and points that are made. We differ in opinion, but both realize that there is validity to the others argument. That is not the case with this discussion currently.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 9:27 am to Masterag
fricking idiots who are jepordizing the health of others.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 9:30 am to cokebottleag
quote:
quote:
According to the GAO, annual federal climate spending has increased from $4.6 billion in 2003 to $8.8 billion in 2010, amounting to $106.7 billion over that period. The money was spent in four general categories: technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, science to understand climate changes, international assistance for developing countries, and wildlife adaptation to respond to actual or expected changes. Technology spending, the largest category, grew from $2.56 billion to $5.5 billion over this period, increasingly advancing over others in total share. Data compiled by Joanne Nova at the Science and Policy Institute indicates that the U.S. Government spent more than $32.5 billion on climate studies between 1989 and 2009. This doesn’t count about $79 billion more spent for climate change technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for “green energy.”
I laugh when people try to say follow the money when it comes to climate and site climate study expenditures while completely ignoring the money from the oil and coal industry. Especially since oil companies have a record of promoting junk science for profit, remember when they said lead was actually good for you.
LINK
Posted on 4/17/15 at 9:43 am to hipgnosis
quote:In Texas, governor "Slick Rick" Perry MANDATED that 11- and 12-year-old girls in Texas get the HPV vaccine.
It's still a 24 billion dollar industry.
It was obvious to all of us that the benevolent Slick Rick was concerned about protecting these little girls against a sexually transmitted disease that causes cervical cancer.
It had nothing whatsoever to do with money. Why can't you see this?
Posted on 4/17/15 at 9:55 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
It's a 24 billion dollar industry, and growing.
It's a drop in he bucket.
This is why I love this board. Outside of a kindergarten playground, you can't get this kind of "reasoning."
Posted on 4/17/15 at 10:04 am to TX Tiger
Sorry you don't know how math works
Posted on 4/17/15 at 10:08 am to TX Tiger
quote:
It had nothing whatsoever to do with money. Why can't you see thi?
Gardasil has an impeccable safety record and reduces ones lifetime risk of cervical cancer by 99.7% and head and neck cancer by 48%.
It works, regardless of how much money it makes.
This post was edited on 4/17/15 at 10:20 am
Posted on 4/17/15 at 10:11 am to Roger Klarvin
the anti vaccine group is the creepy internet conspiracy twats who you immediately want to stop talking to the second the subject changes from sports
Posted on 4/17/15 at 11:34 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:12,424 reported adverse events between June 2006 and December 2008 - included 19 cases of pulmonary embolism, four of which were fatal. Overall, 772 events as serious and included 32 reported deaths.
It had nothing whatsoever to do with money. Why can't you see thi?
Gardasil has an impeccable safety record
quote:Gardasil has been shown to provide protection against persistent cervical HPV 16/18 infections for up to 8 years, which is the maximum time of research follow-up thus far.
reduces ones lifetime risk of cervical cancer
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that most girls live more than eight years. Your claim of safety in ones "lifetime risk" is consistent with your previous uninformed posts.
quote:Those choosing not to take the vaccine reduced their lifestime risk of cervical cancer by 99.3% (0.7% of women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in their lifetime).
reduces ones lifetime risk of cervical cancer by 99.7%
Through lobbying efforts, Merck has suggested that governments make vaccination with Gardasil mandatory for school attendance.
It's all about your safety!
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:06 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
12,424 reported adverse events between June 2006 and December 2008 - included 19 cases of pulmonary embolism, four of which were fatal. Overall, 772 events as serious and included 32 reported deaths.
Thanks for demonstrating you don't understand adverse events.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:23 pm to the808bass
quote:You're right, I don't. That's why I took the information straight from Wiki. Isn't that the "credible" "go-to" source you guys like to use?
12,424 reported adverse events between June 2006 and December 2008 - included 19 cases of pulmonary embolism, four of which were fatal. Overall, 772 events as serious and included 32 reported deaths.
Thanks for demonstrating you don't understand adverse events.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:23 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
12,424 reported adverse events between June 2006 and December 2008 - included 19 cases of pulmonary embolism, four of which were fatal. Overall, 772 events as serious and included 32 reported deaths.
You really shouldn't present things into evidence that you don't understand. In this case, you clearly don't understand how the reporting of adverse events works.
quote:
Gardasil has been shown to provide protection against persistent cervical HPV 16/18 infections for up to 8 years, which is the maximum time of research follow-up thus far.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that most girls live more than eight years. Your claim of safety in ones "lifetime risk" is consistent with your previous uninformed posts.
Again, speaking of that which you lack understanding of.
HPV is acquired during the prime sexual years (15-26) in an estimated 95% of those infected. Thus, a woman vaccinated and immune during this period drastically reduces her chances of ever getting HPV and thus ever getting cervical cancer.
Moreover, 8 years is simply the max study time to date.
quote:
Those choosing not to take the vaccine reduced their lifestime risk of cervical cancer by 99.3% (0.7% of women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in their lifetime).
Good grief
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:36 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Those choosing not to take the vaccine reduced their lifestime risk of cervical cancer by 99.3% (0.7% of women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in their lifetime).
Good grief
99.3% of women never get cervical cancer. Of those, 99% who take the vaccine never get cervical cancer. Some, however, will die from the vaccine, but frick that, let's make it mandatory to take it........for your safety.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:42 pm to TX Tiger
Nobody has ever died from the vaccine. People who got the vaccine have died however.
This is what I meant by you not understanding adverse events
This is what I meant by you not understanding adverse events
Posted on 4/17/15 at 1:12 pm to Roger Klarvin
Even Slimy Slick Rick Perry admitted he made a mistake in mandating the vaccine.
ETA: Hell, even CDC chairman Jon Abramson said he didn't think the vaccine should be mandatory.
Not everyone is driven by fear or profit.
ETA: Hell, even CDC chairman Jon Abramson said he didn't think the vaccine should be mandatory.
Not everyone is driven by fear or profit.
This post was edited on 4/17/15 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 4/17/15 at 1:52 pm to TX Tiger
It shouldn't be mandatory
Doesn't change the fact that everything else you've posted in this thread is incorrect
Doesn't change the fact that everything else you've posted in this thread is incorrect
Posted on 4/17/15 at 2:48 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
You're right, I don't. That's why I took the information straight from Wiki. Isn't that the "credible" "go-to" source you guys like to use?
What do you mean by "you guys?"
I do appreciate the honesty with regards to your ignorance.
This post was edited on 4/17/15 at 2:49 pm
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News