Started By
Message

re: Kurt Cobain sucked male appendages

Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:29 pm to
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Far and away his best talent was songwriting,


Meh. The best thing he did was record other people's songs during that Unplugged session. His talent was singing/screeching.
Posted by Jebeco
Clear Lake City, TX
Member since Jul 2014
3292 posts
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Kurt Cobain


Was never a fan. Couldn't stand Nirvana. Have an upvote.
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Nirvana was first to usher in the mainstream grunge era but that does not make them the best.


But that counts for a helluva lot. Nevermind has sold something like 30 million copies. When it was released, there was nothing from that genre that had sold more than maybe a few 100k. The average American had never listened to what would become known as "grunge" or alternative rock. That album changed music forever.

They were a knock-off of the Pixies and a few other bands. But even the Beatles were a knock-off of Buddy Holly when they first started making music. Paul McCartney even says "Love Me Do" was them just aping Buddy Holly & the Crickets. They even took their name from BH &tC.
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Cornell, Weiland.. hell, even his frickin drummer, Grohl was better.


Holy living shite.

Weiland was great in the same way that Scott Stapp was great, if you're going to start counting dudes who tried-hard/ specialized in Eddie Vedder karaoke. Jeez....

Grohl has a good screamy voice. He was also an amazing drummer for Nirvana. I know it is fashionable to hate on Nirvana because of their commercial success. At the time they came out and topped the charts, there was nothing else like them. They changed what was "mainstream" in a way that almost no bands have in the history of rock music.
This post was edited on 7/18/16 at 1:59 pm
Posted by Mr.Sinister
South Carolina
Member since Dec 2012
4956 posts
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:30 pm to
I don't discount the fact that they changed the landscape of music. Nirvana single handedly killed off big hair 80's music. Def Leppard became dead leppard etc etc.. From that aspect is where they get my respect but purely from a music perspective they were very simplified.
Did I jam out to Nirvana? sure did
I just preferred some of the other "grunge" era bands

Wasn't a Pearl Jam fan either but still respect the fact that they too were part of a new era in music.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260401 posts
Posted on 7/18/16 at 11:31 pm to
quote:


Weiland was great in the same way that Scott Stapp was great, if you're going to start counting dudes who tried-hard/ specialized in Eddie Vedder karaoke. Jeez..


What the hell? Weiland in his prime was one of the best frontmen in the business.
Posted by VagueMessage
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Jun 2013
3903 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 12:37 am to
quote:

Meh. The best thing he did was record other people's songs during that Unplugged session. His talent was singing/screeching.


Sure, his cover of a Bowie song was the best thing he ever did. That and usher in a change in the musical landscape that would affect the next 20 years of rock music. But whose counting?
Posted by VagueMessage
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Jun 2013
3903 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 12:39 am to
quote:

What the hell? Weiland in his prime was one of the best frontmen in the business.


This guy gets it. I know Weiland sounded like an even mix of Staley and Vedder - which is still impressive, IMO - but his stage presence was amazing. And he was a pretty good songwriter on top of that.
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17317 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 8:39 am to
quote:

I love how the hipster crowd had adopted this "it's cool to hate on Kurt" bullshite. You know what Cobain's greatest contribution was? His humility. He recognized the luck of Nirvana's being adopted by the mainstream and used that platform to promote other lesser-known groups like the Meat Puppets, The Frogs, and others.

Get over yourself.




Holy fricking jesus in a tux tshirt, this. Next OP will enlighten us with the profound revelation that Zeppelin ripped off some melodies and therefore they suck. OP probably listens to Bon Jovi on vinyl because it's ironic.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17178 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 10:06 am to
quote:

What the hell? Weiland in his prime was one of the best frontmen in the business.

This. STP was phenomenonal. Wish Scott's solo albums had been better though.
Posted by JacketFan77
Tiger, GA
Member since Nov 2012
2554 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 10:19 am to
STP is hands down the greatest live show I've ever seen -

EDIT: actually, tied for first with RATM + Wu Tang in '97 - that shite was from another dimension.
This post was edited on 7/19/16 at 10:31 am
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17178 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 10:22 am to
I saw Rage in '98, but it was Gang Starr that opened. Nashville.
Posted by JacketFan77
Tiger, GA
Member since Nov 2012
2554 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 10:30 am to
You're right! It was 97! Getting old
Posted by VagueMessage
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Jun 2013
3903 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 2:25 pm to
That dude seriously snapped. It seemed like after the second record he wanted to be Bowie more than he wanted to be in a grunge band, and dressed and wrote his music accordingly. I get the impression he was damn near impossible to work with.

In all honesty, he should have just quit being in bands after the mid '90s and focused entirely on his solo career, because his personality didn't appear to allow him to work with other people in a "we're all equals" sort of capacity.
Posted by p0845330
Member since Aug 2013
5700 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 2:31 pm to
He was something different at the time. That being said, I didn't care for his/their music and still don't. I'm not knocking anyone who's a fan; just my opinion.
Posted by StreamsOfWhiskey
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Jun 2013
581 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

and really didn't hold a candle to a lot of other singers to come out of the grunge era. Agree or disagree?


I'd agree that he didn't hold a candle to Paul Westerberg.
Posted by VagueMessage
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Jun 2013
3903 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 3:49 pm to
The Replacements predate the grunge era by quite a bit. They especially predate when grunge became mainstream. They actually released their seven albums, made their impact, and then broke up before Nirvana even hit the radio.
Posted by Mr.Sinister
South Carolina
Member since Dec 2012
4956 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

I saw Rage in '98, but it was Gang Starr that opened. Nashville.


Saw this same show but in Atlanta.

Posted by CowTownReb
Member since Jan 2013
353 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 3:04 am to
I'd rather watch this guy than any of them.

LINK
Posted by Cobrasize
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2013
49682 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Temple of the Dog — the Seattle supergroup featuring Soundgarden’s Chris Cornell, Pearl Jam’s Jeff Ament, Stone Gossard, and Mike McCready, and drummer Matt Cameron (who plays drums with both Soundgarden and Pearl Jam) — has reunited and will tour for the first time ever since forming in 1990. The band will play five cities, Philadelphia, New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Seattle, in November.

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter