Started By
Message

re: Shouldn't be surprised, but the level of suck

Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:23 pm to
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:23 pm to
Yeah. We know there were talks.

It was all pretty well publicized.

Alden wasn't a ballsy AD. His personality traits were obvious. It's why he's not there anymore. Nice guy. Not a power AD.

The KA hire may not have been the best thing. shite. It's obvious it wasn't.

But the hire happened. Feel like it's our duty to objectively see things for what they are instead of behaving like kids in the back seat on a long distance road trip. It's not as simple as some put it -- 9,10,11 wins.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:36 pm to
We'll agree to disagree that everything is so mutually exclusive. I get what you say about cleaning a house. I just say it was a bad hire because I believe you can clean house and still do better than, you guessed it, 9, 10 and 11 wins.

Regardless, we are where we are now and it's time to move on. KA was a mistake. Let's just not compound it. Get close to the end of the season and let's move on.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

. I just say it was a bad hire because I believe you can clean house and still do better than, you guessed it, 9, 10 and 11 wins.



That's obviously true. I don't disagree with that.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 9:52 pm to
Alden was so personally burned by the Painter saga (where Bernie Miklasz got played by Painter's agent for a couple million) and Mizzou ended up with Mike Alden in a beer goggles panic throwing the job at anyone who'd stop to talk to him at the Final Four. Presto: Frank Haith.

Turns out Alden hated his own hire even more than the fans did. And when he got rid of Frank, Mike turned into a paranoid little bitch. Sending empty planes to places he wasn't going and flying from weird airports to out of the way spots to meet candidates. I think the process took up so much space in his head that he didn't get a full slate of candidates.

Finally, I think he radically overestimated his ability to sell the job and that he'd closed the deal when Marshall left their meeting the week before Kim was announced. So when Marshall called back and declined, we no longer had any good options. It was like a game of Musical coaching chairs and Kim was the only one left with a chair when the music stopped.

I'm not sure why Alden set an artificial end date to the hiring process. Or perhaps someone else set it for him. But we certainly bore the brunt of that as a fan base.
Posted by wubilli
Columbia
Member since Apr 2014
5517 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

So when Marshall called back and declined, we no longer had any good options. It was like a game of Musical coaching chairs and Kim was the only one left with a chair when the music stopped.


This isn't really true. Alden didn't have any interest in KA. Alden was given permission to chase GM. when GM declined Alden was told his secondary options were out and that he was to hire KA.
Howland, Mack, & Underwood were all good coaches that were interested. Mizzou didn't reach out to any of them.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:31 pm to
Who were his secondary options?

Mack was approached from what I heard. Howland wasn't going to be considered right behind Haith.
Posted by wubilli
Columbia
Member since Apr 2014
5517 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:48 pm to
Alden had a list of 4-5 guys. KA wasn't on that list. He was ordered to hire KA, there was a reason Alden had passed on him the 3 previous times Alden hired a coach.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:52 pm to
Of those 4-5 guys, most had withdrawn at the point Marshall said no, correct? The cheater at Tenner and White and Dixon.
Posted by navynuke
Member since Jun 2016
4975 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:46 am to
Whoever the next coach is, he better be able to coax the shooters. Worst shooting team I have ever watched. Started going to games in 1978.
Posted by wubilli
Columbia
Member since Apr 2014
5517 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 9:55 am to
I'm not sure this team is really a terrible shooting team. They just have terrible offensive execution. as a result of not executing any kind of offense, they are missing shots that shouldn't be taken.
Posted by AKTigerChief
Kenai,AK
Member since Dec 2013
60 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:43 pm to
You are just saying that. Go back through first 10 min of each half of AZ game and tell me the kids weren't executing an offense. I saw good passing, pretty good spacing for the most. Heck, we worked the ball inside for two bunnies in the first 3 possessions of second half, we just missed the shots.
Posted by wubilli
Columbia
Member since Apr 2014
5517 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:49 pm to
Look at the start of the game. Mizzou started 2-15 shooting. Of the 13 misses I thought 6 or 7 were bad or contested shots. Now a good or even decent team would make some of those shots, but it wasn't good offense.

One of the things about KA teams each year is that in almost every game, they go through a 5-10 minute stretch of terrible offense. If it was a 30 minute game maybe his teams could compete, probably not though.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:37 pm to
That's true. How many true freshmen were out there when that happened (I wasn't watching).
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

That's true. How many true freshmen were out there when that happened (I wasn't watching).



I didn't watch either but I think I heard that Arizona had 3 true freshmen on the floor. And only 7 overall scholarship players on the roster.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 6:34 pm to
That's different. Their freshmen weren't bad like our freshmen.
This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 6:35 pm
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

And only 7 overall scholarship players on the roster.


What year was it that Mizzou had like 6, maybe 7 guys in their rotation. Everybody else was a walk-on type.

Posted by spytiger
Right Behind You
Member since Aug 2015
568 posts
Posted on 12/15/16 at 11:27 am to
quote:

What year was it that Mizzou had like 6, maybe 7 guys in their rotation. Everybody else was a walk-on type.


Are you talking about Haith's first year?
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 9Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter