Started By
Message
Does the score reflect the Ole Miss/Boise St Game? Thoughts.....
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:14 am
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:14 am
Ole Miss was clearly the better team with superior players finally wearing down Boise St. late in the game. Having said that, (SENIOR) Bo Wallace was suppose to be the complete QB this year but to me, 'more of the same' with (3) INTs.
16
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:16 am to BayouTiga
Without the INTs Ole Miss wins like 49-3 or something.
Don't count on Wallace throwing those picks every game. Could have just been first game jitters.
Don't count on Wallace throwing those picks every game. Could have just been first game jitters.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:18 am to BayouTiga
Last time we saw Bro, he was fumbling away the egg bowl trophy in the end zone..are you really surprised?
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:18 am to BayouTiga
Ole Miss couldn't run at all. 2.1 ypc
Boise's QB was awful as well
Boise's QB was awful as well
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 7:21 am
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:24 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
____________________________
Without the INTs Ole Miss wins like 49-3 or something.
Don't count on Wallace throwing those picks every game. Could have just been first game jitters
___________________________
Agreed on all counts BUT, the 3 INTs was ditto of last year. IF IF IF this and that, Ole Miss would have been undefeated last year.
This is not a hate Ole Miss post, just an observation on Bo Wallace showing signs of a very good QB, then a very bad decision making QB. All the press was, Bo Wallace 'could' lead Ole Miss to new highs this year. Not with last nights performance. And yes, it was only one game.
Without the INTs Ole Miss wins like 49-3 or something.
Don't count on Wallace throwing those picks every game. Could have just been first game jitters
___________________________
Agreed on all counts BUT, the 3 INTs was ditto of last year. IF IF IF this and that, Ole Miss would have been undefeated last year.
This is not a hate Ole Miss post, just an observation on Bo Wallace showing signs of a very good QB, then a very bad decision making QB. All the press was, Bo Wallace 'could' lead Ole Miss to new highs this year. Not with last nights performance. And yes, it was only one game.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:24 am to craigbiggio
That D is nasty, but the O needs work. Not having a bruising RB is a huge void on that O....
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:29 am to BayouTiga
OM looked way worse than expected. I don't understand Freeze's play calling whatsoever.
Their Oline is freakin terrible.
Boise is undersized and not a good team but the OM defense did have a nice game.
Their Oline is freakin terrible.
Boise is undersized and not a good team but the OM defense did have a nice game.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:42 am to PorkSammich
If i was an ole miss fan i wouldnt be too worried outside of the OL. Their D looked really good.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:44 am to BayouTiga
Their defense is flat nasty.
Wallace looked much better in the 2nd once he tried to stop forcing everything. I'd be less concerned about Wallace about more concerned about Freeze's playcalling if I was an Ole Miss fan.
Wallace looked much better in the 2nd once he tried to stop forcing everything. I'd be less concerned about Wallace about more concerned about Freeze's playcalling if I was an Ole Miss fan.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:46 am to BayouTiga
The def was nasty. The front-7 dominated (even without the guy who got ejected) but there was clearly a talent gap most evident between the OL of BS and DL of OM
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:55 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
Without the INTs Ole Miss wins like 49-3 or something. Don't count on Wallace throwing those picks every game. Could have just been first game jitters.
Their QB threw like 4. Do we take those away too?
quote:
Ole Miss couldn't run at all. 2.1 ypc
Also couldn't defend the run, against a young and frankly awful Boise OL. Their DL looked like it had no scheme, they looked like they were constantly trying to just get to the passer. Going to have to shape up in the run game on both sides of the ball.
Other than that they showed potential. A lot of talent but no real direction.
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 8:00 am
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:57 am to BayouTiga
Our offense finally settled down in the second half and got rolling. If Bo doesn't dick around in the first half, we win by 40
Posted on 8/29/14 at 7:58 am to skirpnasty
quote:
Their QB threw like 4. Do we take those away too?
Shut your whore mouth. Everyone hates your ideas.
Even if he hadn't thrown those picks, they would have gotten maybe one more touchdown or a field goal. Our defense was stout last night.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 8:01 am to Henry Jones Jr
If Boise doesn't dick around, you're losing by 10 going into the fourth.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 8:12 am to Henry Jones Jr
The biggest issue I saw was the OL and there seemed to lack team cohesion. There's a lot of talent on the team but I got the impression it was a bunch of big headed superstar individuals and not a team. Against a good SEC team that could be a problem...OM had no good sustained drives only big plays. SEC defenses won't allow that many big plays for touchdowns
Posted on 8/29/14 at 8:14 am to BayouTiga
I would say their biggest concern is that boise was able to shut down their run game.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 8:14 am to deltaland
I can't wait to play ole miss now, we will tear that Defense to shreds.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 8:18 am to agrunner
Lulz. Our defense is way better than USCe
Posted on 8/29/14 at 8:19 am to agrunner
quote:
I can't wait to play ole miss now, we will tear that Defense to shreds.
Aggy fans are far worse than Arky fans when they're somewhat successful.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 8:27 am to BayouTiga
Good lord. Bo threw for almost 400 yards and 4 TDs. He wasn't great but if that's a bad performance, I don't know what to tell you people.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News