0
Started By
Message
re: Why doesnt A&M's recruiting success draw more suspicion on this board
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:00 pm to auburnphan23
Posted on 4/14/14 at 6:00 pm to auburnphan23
If you happened to be a football recruit, you'd be a D-III walkon.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 8:44 pm to EKG
So defensive. Wonder why?
quote:this statement is very true. Lsu has been very mediocre as of lately. Still we are undefeated against the Aggies and have won both sec titles and national titles since 2000. The only recruiting threats are out of state schools who already have instate battles (I.e. Longhorns v. Aggies, tide v. tigers) it is my experience as a self proclaimed Texan that UT has more pull with texas kids (historically). A&M is the IT program now. It'll be hard to stay there playing in the west (bama, lsu, auburn) and with Strong recruiting the way he is and other factors like Baylor and A&M now competing.
LSU has been extremely mediocre since the SEC expanded then
This post was edited on 4/14/14 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:27 am to JimmyHDeridderhigh
With Strong recruiting the way he is? You mean like Franchione?
Posted on 4/15/14 at 6:49 pm to Tennessee Jed
I don't buy for a second that Arkansas, a school with lots of deep pocket boosters, is paying players. Our recruiting would be way, way better...we'd get the occasional 5 star from out of state.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:06 pm to auburnphan23
Then you would be wrong Auburnphan23... Ignoring 5-10 Top 10 finishes in the 70's , 80's and 90's with 7-8 conf Champ and 7-8 top 5 recruiting classes.
00-10 was the WORST decade ( next to 60's) of A&M football, but that was the anomoly.
00-10 was the WORST decade ( next to 60's) of A&M football, but that was the anomoly.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News