Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:32 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
So you're glad to have lost him?
because grades
because grades
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:35 am to cas4t
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:37 am to cas4t
So you didn't read the thread either? I guess I'll explain it on this page too
Earlier in the day before he committed (ie when he was still thought to be a lean to us) a UT mod posted that he was a grade risk and would likely be going JUCO.
It was posted on here because either it was a)bullshite and they were slinging shite around because they thought he was going to A&M (I would say this is the most likely scenario)or b) it's true and he's actually a huge grade risk. The timing was humorous and I'm interested to see how they spin it.
It obviously sucks to lose him and unless I break into Navasota HS I have no way of knowing if he's actually a grade risk
Earlier in the day before he committed (ie when he was still thought to be a lean to us) a UT mod posted that he was a grade risk and would likely be going JUCO.
It was posted on here because either it was a)bullshite and they were slinging shite around because they thought he was going to A&M (I would say this is the most likely scenario)or b) it's true and he's actually a huge grade risk. The timing was humorous and I'm interested to see how they spin it.
It obviously sucks to lose him and unless I break into Navasota HS I have no way of knowing if he's actually a grade risk
This post was edited on 7/15/15 at 10:38 am
Posted on 7/15/15 at 11:04 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
that's all fine and dandy.
but I'm now having a hard time understanding what you were implying with the "we told you so" post of yours. I don't see the point. What are you claiming? That A&M said nevermind, or what?
eta or were you agreeing with brag that he wasn't high on the a&m board because of grades?
but I'm now having a hard time understanding what you were implying with the "we told you so" post of yours. I don't see the point. What are you claiming? That A&M said nevermind, or what?
eta or were you agreeing with brag that he wasn't high on the a&m board because of grades?
This post was edited on 7/15/15 at 11:05 am
Posted on 7/15/15 at 11:07 am to cas4t
Nothing has been said by any of our chucklefrick recruiting analysts to indicate we backed off him. We lost out on him. Where was my "I told you so" post?
Posted on 7/15/15 at 11:10 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
the post where you responded to brag about yall already saying on here that he was a potential grade risk.
He implied in his post that yall backed off due to grades and you basically agreed with him. Or that's how it appears. I don't really care, I didn't mean for this to become such a thing.
He implied in his post that yall backed off due to grades and you basically agreed with him. Or that's how it appears. I don't really care, I didn't mean for this to become such a thing.
Posted on 7/15/15 at 11:14 am to cas4t
quote:
the post where you responded to brag about yall already saying on here that he was a potential grade risk.
We didn't? We said the UT mods had said he was literally the same day, and it was funny that he committed to them later that day after them basically saying he wouldn't qualify
quote:
He implied in his post that yall backed off due to grades and you basically agreed with him
I think you're misinterpreting what i said, I have no way of knowing if he's a grade risk
I was pointing out that we brought it up because it had been the UT line throughout his recruitment when he was thought to be leaning to A&MPosted on 7/15/15 at 11:26 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
I think you're misinterpreting what i said
I think I did too
Believe it or not I was sincere when I said I was having a hard time understanding what you meant.
Posted on 7/15/15 at 11:34 am to cas4t
It's hard to tell sometimes
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News