Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/11/14 at 9:44 am to engie
quote:
Yards Per Completion:
Wallace - 11.82
Dak - 12.44
Hmmmm
THAT SAYZ IT ALL RIGHT THERE PEEPLE
RUSH YARDS PER CARRY:
I'TAVIUS MATHERS - 5.9
TRE MASON -5.7
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:08 am to REBEL5 AC
quote:
THAT SAYZ IT ALL RIGHT THERE PEEPLE
RUSH YARDS PER CARRY:
I'TAVIUS MATHERS - 5.9
TRE MASON -5.7
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
This supposed to be a competition between "shut down by MSU" vs "also shut down by MSU"?
Interesting you would bring that stat up though.
Dak Prescott - 6.19 yards/carry.
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:11 am to pankReb
quote:
you can't pick a single stat that backs up any sort of legitimate argument you make. Yards per completion? Come on.....If you don't want any stat that takes YAC into consideration....you can't take any stat that takes incompletions into consideration.
It's difficult to make a "legitimate" argument against one that changes with every successive post...
Your initial argument was about the deep ball. I can totally understand trying to change it now that you realize how fricking stupid it was.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:18 am to engie
quote:
It's difficult to make a "legitimate" argument against one that changes with every successive post...
Your initial argument was about the deep ball.
It still has yet to change. I'm not sure why you're so confused.
Well....you being a bumbling idiot is a strong theory of mine.
I pointed out your stat of YPC is a farce being that if you completed one long pass and a million interceptions....you'd have a great YPC.
Dexter McCluster's QB stat: 1 for 6, 27 yards and a TD. Giving him a YPC of 27....which, by your argument, makes him an elite QB. We all know that's not the case. His YPA is 4.7.....which is horrible and fits his abilities as a collegiate QB .
My argument is still pertaining to the deep ball. One in that stats say Wallace is better than Dak(albeit not by much). Your only argument against it is YAC(which is not recognized by the NCAA) and YPC(which this stat makes about as much sense as nailing jello to a tree).
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:36 am to engie
If you just look at stats(like you are doing), Bo shits on Dak. Like literally, not figuratively, pulls down his pants and shits on Dak.
FWIW, I hate Bo.
FWIW, I hate Bo.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:44 am to REBEL5 AC
quote:
If you just look at stats(like you are doing), Bo shits on Dak. Like literally, not figuratively, pulls down his pants and shits on Dak.
Lulz. Dak accounted for more touchdowns, more touchdowns per play, and more yards per play overall. He was better than Bo in ever aspect that matters.
But keep holding onto the "yards per attempt" category. It's all you've got left -- and unless you are a total fricking moron, you fully realize Dak is poised to take that one from you too.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:47 am to engie
You form arguements worse than this guy holds a fish.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:52 am to pankReb
quote:
My argument is still pertaining to the deep ball.
Then you are a fricking idiot LITERALLY in the same vein as your Rebel brethren that argued Brunetti's superiority to Dak as a runner earlier in the season. You are blind to your own reality.
quote:
One in that stats say Wallace is better than Dak(albeit not by much). Your only argument against it is YAC(which is not recognized by the NCAA) and YPC(which this stat makes about as much sense as nailing jello to a tree).
How in the frick is YPA more valid than YPC as a measure of throwing a deep ball? Answer - it isn't. They are equally fricking worthless.
So, Bo goes 5 of 6 for 50 yards -- and Dak goes 3 of 6 for 45 -- that means Bo Wallace throws the deep ball better than Dak? Yet I'M the one that's cherrypicking worthless fricking stats in a stupid arse argument...
And comparing it to a guy that threw 6 total passes is laughable as frick as an attempted skew.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:54 am to Rebelgator
Genius!!!1!1 I sure wish I could "hold fish" like that guy!1!1
This post was edited on 2/11/14 at 10:54 am
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:57 am to engie
Nice screenshot. Bet you've got a sweet fedora too, dickwad.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 10:57 am to engie
So how's your Chem-trail research going? Have any good videos of suspicious trains yet?
Posted on 2/11/14 at 11:01 am to pankReb
You woulda thought Bro'z Wallace would have had some Heizmanz mentionz by now, according to the Bearzz!!!
Posted on 2/11/14 at 11:09 am to Klongdawg
MSUz fanz arez puttingz alotz ofz stockz inz az companyz thatz letz youz betz onz everythingsz includingz thez firstz commercialz ofz thez superz bowlz.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 11:12 am to pankReb
Da Bearzzz Fo Lifezzzz!!! 
Posted on 2/11/14 at 11:25 am to Klongdawg
Posted on 2/11/14 at 11:40 am to pankReb
Nice deflection when your argument is shot to shite.
This where you tell me how "Mississippi State fans only want to go 1-11 and beat Ole Miss"!11!1 under some sort of douchey semblance of superiority you've never lived to see in any big 3 sport.
This where you tell me how "Mississippi State fans only want to go 1-11 and beat Ole Miss"!11!1 under some sort of douchey semblance of superiority you've never lived to see in any big 3 sport.
This post was edited on 2/11/14 at 11:41 am
Posted on 2/11/14 at 11:46 am to engie
Engie making it rain!!!! Gotemzzzz
Posted on 2/11/14 at 12:01 pm to engie
quote:
"Mississippi State fans only want to go 1-11 and beat Ole Miss"!11!1
Posted on 2/11/14 at 12:02 pm to RebFeBrees
quote:
"Mississippi State fans only want to go 1-11 and beat Ole Miss and then eat at Beef O'Bradys"!11!1
Page 11 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News