Started By
Message
re: Would an undefeated mizzou get the '04 auburn treatment?
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:59 pm to PepaSpray
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:59 pm to PepaSpray
quote:
tubby hosted two 2 TWO div I aa teams that year.
That is why they were left out.
Who cares? Everyone plays some shite out of conference games. That Auburn team beat a lot of ranked opponents. USC and Oklahoma didn't do shite.
And I don't remember who you're talking about, but I bet if they replaced those two games with whatever rent-a-win division 1 team you want, it wouldn't have changed the final bcs standings.
This post was edited on 10/21/13 at 7:00 pm
0
Posted on 10/21/13 at 7:01 pm to Fab4Freddy
quote:I disagree, Auburn will win more than 8 games now.
8-4. this thread is not necessary
Posted on 10/21/13 at 7:04 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
The computers already have Mizzou ahead of Oregon.
I think we'll be fine when we destroy 'the process'.
I think we'll be fine when we destroy 'the process'.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 7:13 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
Whole lot of ifs in the question, but it has already been asked and answered on the BCS Countdown
If Mizzou ends up 13-0 ...They will be playing for the NC
They would have beaten the reigning champ...Of course, this means, Bama needs to keep winning as well.
Long shot....you betcha! But not impossible, yet.
If Mizzou ends up 13-0 ...They will be playing for the NC
They would have beaten the reigning champ...Of course, this means, Bama needs to keep winning as well.
Long shot....you betcha! But not impossible, yet.
This post was edited on 10/21/13 at 7:25 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News