Started By
Message
re: Weak non-conference scheduling in baseball and basketball?
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:07 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:07 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
quote:
Moron, Delmonico was such a good coach he is still unemployed. He did good when he wanted to which was every 4 years or so. Other than that he was lazy and left next to nothing for Raleigh who did literally nothing for 4 years and made it worse.
So, surely, you should be competing for titles in year 3. 2 lazy coaches in a row should be an easy rebuild for a guy that took over a program with 3 years in existence and took them to a regional in year 2 and the CWS in year 3 thereafter.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:10 pm to engie
Yes, most college baseball people would have said Tennessee was an easy rebuild. Raleigh and Delmonico had horrible relationships with TN High school coaches that are just now being rebuilt. Find me one person other than your idiot self that think the TEnnessee job when Serrano took over after 4 years of Raleigh was an easy rebuild and that they should be competing for titles in Year 3.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:18 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
All I know is that UF scheduled too strong for non-conference in baseball.
Sante Fe CC might be the best baseball team in Alachua County.
Sante Fe CC might be the best baseball team in Alachua County.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:19 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
quote:
So Serrano has to get to the cws in year 3 when it took Cohen 3 years just to get to a regional
Cohen was 5 outs from Omaha in year 3 against the eventual national runner up. Get it right. And nowhere here have I called him one of the best coaches in college baseball and proceeded to argue about that when proven otherwise. He's got the damn ball rolling now though, doesn't he? Can tell because of how mad you obviously are about it.
quote:
none so far at a powerhouse baseball school?
He has rebuilt 2 programs. Gave the last program the best year in their history by far. But you are right -- Kentucky is FAR from a powerhouse school.
quote:
Lol at his first two seasons in starkville.
Lol at Serrano's first 2 in Knoxville. Let's face facts -- this one is imminently terrible. Let me know when you win a regional in year 3.
quote:
Henderson at uk is a mich better coach than the average cohen.
That's why we took 4 of 5 from him last year right?
112-88 > 175-112-1 according to Tennessee math.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:26 pm to engie
Lol at Cohen being 41 games BELOW .500 in SEC games as head coach. Uk had 45 wins last year, which is more than Cohen ever had. I though cohen had the best year ever by car at Uk?
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:28 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
My bad. Cohen is 51 games below .500 as an sec coach. 29 games under .500 at miss state, a powerhouse school.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:35 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
quote:
Yes, most college baseball people would have said Tennessee was an easy rebuild. Raleigh and Delmonico had horrible relationships with TN High school coaches that are just now being rebuilt. Find me one person other than your idiot self that think the TEnnessee job when Serrano took over after 4 years of Raleigh was an easy rebuild and that they should be competing for titles in Year 3.
I didn't say it WAS an easy rebuild. Quite the contrary actually if we're being honest. I'm just calling out how ridiculously stupid the "he built UC Irvine from the ground up into a national powerhouse in 3 years" idea is...
If he could build a CWS contender in 3 years at Irvine and is "generational" guru that you are arguing that he is here -- surely he can do this in Knoxville in the same amount of time? The point I'm making is that he inherited a DAMN FINE situation in Irvine -- and the more you argue this, the more ridiculous it makes you seem.
Simple. Just admit what I said was true -- that he appears to be a damn good coach that the jury is still out on in a complete rebuild-type situation -- because his two previous jobs were basically "very-difficult-to-miss" gold mines, where he did a very good job but not a legendary job. The point I was and am making is that we will judge how "great" of coach he really is by how he actually rebuilds Tennessee. What he did before he got to the SEC and took on an (actually difficult coaching) task is basically immaterial. He hasn't proven anything in a "difficult situation" yet.
Tennessee is a definitely a difficult rebuild. I never said it wasn't. MSU was a bitch to rebuild. Simple facts. Still easier for you -- without a split fanbase that is (half) pissed off about the coach you hired -- and with lottery scholarships more than doubling the baseball money available to you on a yearly basis...but that is beside the point.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:40 pm to engie
Moron, i never said he built Irvine from the ground up. He improved on what Savage did to start. You tries to say serrano won with Savages players which isnt true and that Gillespie has accomPlished more which hasnt. Even if he had, he did it with serrano players using your flawed logic.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:41 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
quote:
Lol at Cohen being 41 games BELOW .500 in SEC games as head coach.
Give it time grasshopper.
Your "best coach EVARRRR" is 14 games BELOW .500 in year 1. And he's rebuilding his first program. Cohen has rebuilt two.
quote:
Uk had 45 wins last year, which is more than Cohen ever had.
Cohen won 20 SEC games and won the regular season SEC title. AT KENTUCKY. No other coach in the 110 year history of that program can make that claim. So, yes, best in the history of the school.
What is Serrano's claim to fame? Only UC Irvine coach to make Omaha in that program's 11 year history? Despite the new guy having a better winning percentage and more regular season success? Color me amazed by that statline.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:43 pm to engie
So, surely, you should be competing for titles in year 3. 2 lazy coaches in a row should be an easy rebuild for a guy that took over a program with 3 years in existence and took them to a regional in year 2 and the CWS in year 3 thereaft
Your words....easy rebuild^
Make no mistake though serrano will
Never be 51 games below .500
In sec games
Your words....easy rebuild^
Make no mistake though serrano will
Never be 51 games below .500
In sec games
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:45 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
quote:
Moron, i never said he built Irvine from the ground up.
You've implied it nonstop. 3 years, CWS remember? That's all you've talked about in this thread.
quote:
You tries to say serrano won with Savages players which isnt true and that Gillespie has accomPlished more which hasnt.
Gillespie has definitely accomplished more. He's won more, had better regular seasons, etc. Just hasn't made it to Omaha yet. The day he does, he officially replaces Serrano as that program's "best alltime coach".
quote:
Even if he had, he did it with serrano players using your flawed logic.
So, you are saying that Gillespie is a better recruiter than Serrano? Or Savage is? Which is it. You are trying to have your cake and eat it too on this one.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:50 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
quote:
So, surely, you should be competing for titles in year 3. 2 lazy coaches in a row should be an easy rebuild for a guy that took over a program with 3 years in existence and took them to a regional in year 2 and the CWS in year 3 thereaft
Exactly. I see where you left off the questionmark in the sentence in order to imply that I was making a statement when I was asking a question. Guess that wouldn't fit your agenda though.
If he's as good as you say he is based on his experience at Irvine, he should be CWS-bound in year 3 at Tennessee. Yes or no? You can't have it both ways. Jesus you can't be this dense.
quote:
Make no mistake though serrano will
Never be 51 games below .500
In sec games
Lulz. Guy goes 8-22 and is well on his way to another 10 games below .500(at least) and "he'll nevAr be!!1!1..."
He'll be halfway there in year 2 -- meanwhile Cohen is in year 10 and make no mistake, we will be WELL above .500 this year in conference. Take out the 4 rebuild years(2 different programs) and let me know how good Cohen is then. If we are being factual, THIS is the first year that MSU is fully rebuilt... Meanwhile, he built Kentucky from nothing.
This post was edited on 2/28/13 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:53 pm to engie
51 games below .500!
Gillespie best year so far was year 2 with serrano recruits. Serrano win with the majaority of his Players on the way to Omaha. I emphasized 3 year because you were said Irvine was goIng to be a powerhouse regardless even though they had 3 years and 4 games above .500
Gillespie best year so far was year 2 with serrano recruits. Serrano win with the majaority of his Players on the way to Omaha. I emphasized 3 year because you were said Irvine was goIng to be a powerhouse regardless even though they had 3 years and 4 games above .500
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:55 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
quote:
LSU in basketball this year as well.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 8:56 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
They are still winning aren't they? Are Serrano's recruits still winning for them?
Probably so, says fulmersgonnafixit!1!!1
Imminent. Powerhouse. Read until understood.
Probably so, says fulmersgonnafixit!1!!1
Imminent. Powerhouse. Read until understood.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 9:01 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
Your program is 59 games below .500 in the past 7 years. Imminent powerhouse!!1!1
Posted on 2/28/13 at 9:03 pm to engie
They are still winning because they hired another really good coach. Three great hires in a row for uci
Posted on 2/28/13 at 9:07 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
51 games below .500 at a powerhouse sec school in sec games. Lmao!
Posted on 2/28/13 at 9:11 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
Lol at wanting to throw out the rebuiding years. I would too if we only won 6 games in sec one year.
Posted on 2/28/13 at 9:13 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
WhAt does well above .500 translate to? You were bitching about how tough a schedule miss state has. I guess means at least 20-10 this year in sec?
Popular
Back to top


1



