Started By
Message

re: The Democrats cheated in the 2020 election. Donald Trump will win in 2024

Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:37 pm to
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
39391 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

Come on Junior, the NCAA works totally different. Again, they do not care about any final record in CF Division I games. You can google any website and get an answer you believe, but the NCAA is the final authority on this. The real reason why forfeits are scarce is because the NCAA has promoted cooperation and wants the schools to submit a report with punishment. That is where the schools choose to vacate wins. Alabama was the last cowboy that got its dick slapped.




I mean Ohio St vacated it's wins after being caught directly lying to the NCAA to the point of it ending with their coach getting multi-year show cause.

And of course, USC itself was given lack of institutional control, LSU just got it to the point of having their case sent to a special committee. Ole Miss denied denied denied.



Everything you say is false. I'm not even sure how it can't be on purpose.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

"There is a difference," Dee said."It's not semantics -- it's real -- between vacation and forfeiture," Dee continued. "In vacation, only the team involved, only in wins, do they vacate the wins. In forfeiture, you would not only vacate the win, but the opponent would improve their record. This was not a forfeiture, so therefore the rule only applies to the University of Alabama. It does not allow for any other university to improve its record."

That's why, in Alabama's revised results, the Tide was 0-2 in 2005, 0-7 in 2006, and 2-6 in 2007. Nothing for the opponents changed



Which is exactly why schools offer up vacated wins vs the NCAA forcing forfeiture. Dee doesn't bother explaining if the NCAA force forfeitures it would throw schools into legal battle with their own coaches. Even well after the fact. There is not a coach in the country the last 20 years that didn't have wins as part of their contract. The definition is only there to protect the member schools from litigation and backpay.
This post was edited on 7/18/22 at 8:48 pm
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

I mean Ohio St vacated it's wins after being caught directly lying to the NCAA to the point of it ending with their coach getting multi-year show cause.

And of course, USC itself was given lack of institutional control, LSU just got it to the point of having their case sent to a special committee. Ole Miss denied denied denied.



Everything you say is false. I'm not even sure how it can't be on purpose.




Again, did the NCAA vacate those wins or did the school agree to vacate those wins? Show cause is about a coaches next job.

Lack of institutional control has nothing to due with the on the field results, it is about punishing the school for turning a blind eye. The NCAA looks at it differently if it doesn't involve recruiting or a coverup to a know violation.

What is LSUs final punishment? Any forfeits or vacated wins.

Posted by Marktastic86
Pismo Beach, CA
Member since Dec 2020
21881 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Irons Puppet


Just make this your avatar. It describes you as a person better than anything else. Pretending you're owning everyone while knowing deep down that you're completely full of shite and your fabricated arguments are built on nothing but weak opinions and that you're destined to lose.

Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50580 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:57 pm to
Ole Miss told the NCAA to kick rocks. They didn’t agree to a damn thing. Wins vacated, not forfeited. Because “agreeing to it” has not jack shite to do with it, and you won’t find a single source that backs what you’re saying.

2004 USC was undefeated.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:10 pm to

quote:

Ole Miss told the NCAA to kick rocks. They didn’t agree to a damn thing. Wins vacated, not forfeited. Because “agreeing to it” has not jack shite to do with it, and you won’t find a single source that backs what you’re saying.


LINK

Ole miss vacates wins and are not forced to vacate the wins. What don't you understand about that. Even Bjork admits

“It’s the last part of this process,” Bjork said, according to Rivals.com. “In a way it’s just a piece of paper because you saw those games.”

Ole Miss agreed to vacate those wins and you can not find a quote by anyone the says they refuse to acknowledge games as wins.

quote:

2004 USC was undefeated.


Your simplistic mind thinks if you vacate the wins the game never happened, thus a team that vacates an undefeated season can still claim an undefeated season and a NC.

Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50580 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:11 pm to
You are not a real person.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

Marktastic86


You Bammers live in your own world and are lead by a guy who is 5'6".


Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
39391 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:18 pm to
quote:



Again, did the NCAA vacate those wins or did the school agree to vacate those wins? Show cause is about a coaches next job.

Lack of institutional control has nothing to due with the on the field results, it is about punishing the school for turning a blind eye. The NCAA looks at it differently if it doesn't involve recruiting or a coverup to a know violation.

What is LSUs final punishment? Any forfeits or vacated wins.



Can't fix stupid, but I can stop wasting time on it.

You make LSUStephen seem reasonable.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Can't fix stupid, but I can stop wasting time on it.



Because you can't argue against it. You are the one who looks foolish with your understanding of NCAA procedures and rulings. But you will never see the truth because of your bammer ignorance and defense of anything relating to Bama. It is a stretch in this case, but you still went the hole 9 yards.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50580 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

You are the one who looks foolish with your understanding of NCAA procedures and rulings.


Unreal.

Was USC’s 2004 football team undefeated or not?
Posted by brennans flip flops
Georgia
Member since Jan 2022
800 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 9:40 pm to
And it’s July.. Alabama gonna be top 3 when it’s all said and done.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 10:15 pm to
On the field with ineligible players. Not in the record books with those who determine the mythical NC.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50580 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

in the record books with those who determine the mythical NC.


Oh? Which games went into the record books as losses?
Posted by Nitro Express
Gulf Coast
Member since Jul 2018
17828 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

Worst poster is the best poster on here. A counter to the Cult gets my vote. I'm sure there are others more worthy.



This sums up Irons Puppet better than any post he's ever made. Up is down and down is up.

Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 10:32 pm to
Those game vacated. Did USC vacate the BCSNC? Why would the BCS not give the championship for a game set up by the BCS and won by USC?

Can you vacate a home and still claim ownership. Can you vacate a Marriage and not have to pay child support or alimony? Sounds like you want to redefine the word.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 10:36 pm to
The Cult trying to claim a championship when a team was caught cheating and were sent to prison for it. But they want the team to reap the benefits of the cheating when the NCAA says no way. That defines Bama fans better than any post.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50580 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

Those game vacated. Did USC vacate the BCSNC? Why would the BCS not give the championship for a game set up by the BCS and won by USC? Can you vacate a home and still claim ownership. Can you vacate a Marriage and not have to pay child support or alimony? Sounds like you want to redefine the word.


None of this is relevant to your comment:

quote:

2004, only undefeated team from a major conference.


Which you’ve finally admitted you were wrong about - after several pages of nonsensical tail chasing.
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
20728 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

quote:The decline is real.


As real as your ability to read this thread.


This is hall of fame type posting from the gumps.

Then there’s 3 gumpier gumps upvoting this gumpsastional post.


Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 10:56 pm to
It is all relevant. USC was caught cheating and used an ineligible player in the Championship Game. The NCAA caught them and USC not only admitted to the violation but vacated the win. By vacating the win they forfeited the NC and the trophy. To do that is is a loss and a win wasn't awarded to OU. You claim a vacated game means the game never happened based on your made up definition, so if that was the case there were two major college undefeated teams. But Auburn is the only recognized undefeated team by the BCS.Because they do not recognize USC as an undefeated team. Man you are dense, you argue againt yourself. Lol.
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17 18 19 ... 43
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 43Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter