Started By
Message
re: Is the SEC West Still Superior to the East?
Posted on 11/17/14 at 3:35 pm to dawg4lyfe
Posted on 11/17/14 at 3:35 pm to dawg4lyfe
quote:
As much as i want to defend this, only Georgia and Missouri are good. And Missouri doesn't have the offense to hang with the top 3 West teams.
Alabama would beat the Dawgs like they stole something. So would Missy State this year.
Posted on 11/17/14 at 3:36 pm to Masterag
quote:
Mizzou beat us with our best player out and half our starting d sidelined as well. Congrats on barely beating a depleted team of true freshmen led by a true freshman qb. Go crazy!
RIIIIIIIIIIGHT, because we weren't missing 100% of our secondary or anything like that.
Posted on 11/17/14 at 3:37 pm to Masterag
quote:
Mizzou beat us with our best player out and half our starting d sidelined as well. Congrats on barely beating a depleted team of true freshmen led by a true freshman qb. Go crazy!
Excuses are like assholes, chief.
Posted on 11/17/14 at 4:17 pm to skrayper
quote:im pretty sure he is a Georgia alum
Posted by skrayper
quote:
The SEC West is 0-2 against UGA this season. fact.
Resorting to dick riding Georgia... sad.
Posted on 11/17/14 at 4:21 pm to PNW
Most definitely yes for this year. The gap isn't as wide as some perceived earlier in the year...but the west is still better top to bottom.
Posted on 11/17/14 at 4:26 pm to Masterag
quote:
Mizzou beat us with our best player out and half our starting d sidelined as well. Congrats on barely beating a depleted team of true freshmen led by a true freshman qb. Go crazy!
You've got 4 losses...puhleeze. It's not like you've been unbeatable all year. You were crowing that you were unbeatable earlier in the year with those true freshmen...what happened? Did they get bad all of a sudden?
Posted on 11/17/14 at 4:33 pm to ATLSU7
Put LSU in the "ACC North" and they still lose their two games versus the west this year
Posted on 11/17/14 at 4:33 pm to mizslu314
quote:
RIIIIIIIIIIGHT, because we weren't missing 100% of our secondary or anything like that.
Seriously, has no one noticed that this was the first time Mizzou has had their 3 starting receivers all play since SEC games started?
Haven't heard shite about why our offense was sucking arse, but we still found a way to win. A&M just doesn't have SEC depth.
Posted on 11/17/14 at 4:44 pm to Mizz-SEC
quote:
Gauntlet. The gauntlet wore them down.
yea wore them down so bad they beat the SEC defending west team...
lulz!
Posted on 11/17/14 at 4:46 pm to MIZ_USA
quote:
Excuses are like assholes, chief.
interesting excuses are what we keep hearing for the results last Sat where 2 of your West teams bit the dirt against the East.
Also interesting how the pundits here said Mizzou had no chance this year after graduating over half the starting class from last season.
I know, I know.. now we're just one of the SEC teams that "reload" right?

you clowns don't know if you're coming or going but it sure is entertaining!
Posted on 11/17/14 at 5:35 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
I know, I know.. now we're just one of the SEC teams that "reload" right?

Posted on 11/17/14 at 6:17 pm to Masterag
quote:
Mizzou beat us with our best player out and half our starting d sidelined as well. Congrats on barely beating a depleted team of true freshmen led by a true freshman qb. Go crazy!
Hey dumbfrick, Mizzou lost over half their starters on offense from last season, and it's showing. WTF are you talking about. What about all those "good" recruits you have vs Mizzou's 2-3* players. frickin suck. 2 out of 3 since joining the SEC. But yall were suppose to be the better pick up.

This post was edited on 11/17/14 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 11/17/14 at 6:20 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
Also interesting how the pundits here said Mizzou had no chance this year after graduating over half the starting class from last season.
Ding ding ding. And they are STILL competing. Now what's the other school's reasons for sucking? Mizzou is competing with less talent, crappy stadium, bad tailgaters, cold up north, etc.

Back to top
