Started By
Message
re: if 16 are teams are inevitable
Posted on 3/30/13 at 5:32 pm to TheCheshireHog
Posted on 3/30/13 at 5:32 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
I dunno, I think LSU would be able to carry the dead weight in their division. They don't look to be slowing down anytime soon.
The direction Ole Miss is going vs. the direction Arky is going?
Such a tough choice!
0
Posted on 3/30/13 at 6:05 pm to Mirthomatic
quote:
NW:
Alabama (Tenn)
Auburn (UGA)
Missouri (Arkansas)
MSU (Ole Miss)
SW:
LSU (Florida)
A&M (Va Tech)
Arkansas (Missouri)
Ole Miss (MSU)
NE:
Tennessee (Alabama)
Va Tech (A&M)
NC (USC)
Vanderbilt (KY)
SE:
Florida (LSU)
UGA (Auburn)
USC (NC)
Kentucky (Vandy)
quote:
Aside from the option of 2-3 permanent opponents and then using lottery to determine the rest of the schedule, this is my favorite solution so far.
It really is the cleanest I've seen. Most all the primary rivals are maintained, the geography is reasonable, and it appears about as competitively balanced long-term as possible.
But if it's Duke rather than VPI as #16, I think you have to go back to the drawing board as the NE would be too weak and no one would be happy if A&M got Duke as a cross-divisional game
Page 12 of 12
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News