Honest Question for Aggies (week 2 edition)

I asked this question last week (granted, after a win)

quote:

---

Is there anyone out there who still will say they would prefer Marcel “defenses are hard to” Reed over Arch?

It was odd to hear that position last year when it was empirically shown that Marcel play cost them the playoffs and plugging in Arch play at the end of the season they win games, but after week 2 are there still Marcel believers?

---

and got this all-time great answers:

@jayag - Reed is good. You have Arch.

@aggiearchitect - He’s cheaper than Arch with probably similar results.
He’s cheaper than Arch with probably similar results.

@oldmarge - I would not want arch Manning as a quarterback, all he has going for him is his feet, maybe he’ll continue to improve but right now he does not like look like a 4th-year quarterback which he is

--

So for this week, to avoid the "whaboutism" and equivication, the question is simply:

What about Marcel Reed experiment is going right in the Year of our Lord 2026 and what do you want to be salvaged and what do you expect to see changed in order to save the season?