Started By
Message
re: Facility Ranking - Top 25 (247)
Posted on 12/11/17 at 2:43 pm to Farmer1906
Posted on 12/11/17 at 2:43 pm to Farmer1906
Interesting...Clemson #2...How are we able to do this without all of that SEC Money?
This post was edited on 12/11/17 at 2:43 pm
1
Posted on 12/11/17 at 3:23 pm to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
Interesting...Clemson #2...How are we able to do this without all of that SEC Money?
Why are you here? Is there not an ACC board?
Posted on 12/11/17 at 3:24 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Ole Miss & MSU weight the west down
It's not us, I can promise you.
Posted on 12/11/17 at 3:26 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
8. LSU
pretty solid for a bunch of poors amirite
Posted on 12/11/17 at 3:41 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Suprised there is no Arkansas. Ole Miss & MSU weight the west down.
I'm surprised they lsted a few schools with plans or breaking ground. Nothing built.
Posted on 12/11/17 at 3:45 pm to Farmer1906
WTF? Is Coleman that much of a drag on us? The Joe and the football facilities are first class, can't believe it was good for 5th in the league, unless it was that shithole Coleman. And the Natatorium that is embarrassing.
Posted on 12/11/17 at 3:47 pm to Farmer1906
Print the T-shirts
Posted on 12/11/17 at 3:56 pm to Farmer1906
LOL! The only 2 in the Top 10 getting a return on their investments are Clemson and BAMA. The isn't the NFL, you can't buy championships. You have to recruit and COACH them. If I were an aTm or Vol supporter, I'd want a refund!
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News