| |||
Forum
Message
Hydroxychloroquine for trump
Posted by Bayou Sam on 10/2/20 at 4:45 pm
Does anyone know if our president is taking Hydroxychloroquine? I learned on this board that the liberal media was lying to crash the economy and bring in Maoism and that this was the cure.
-17Lady Snowblood
Posted by Bayou Sam on 2/22/16 at 10:56 am
This is just a head's up for those interested.
Lady Snowblood, the movie that inspired Kill Bill, was released recently via Criterion. If you like Kill Bill, you should check this one out--in many ways it's better than Tarantino's version. You can stream it if you have Hulu Plus.
Lady Snowblood, the movie that inspired Kill Bill, was released recently via Criterion. If you like Kill Bill, you should check this one out--in many ways it's better than Tarantino's version. You can stream it if you have Hulu Plus.
Paris, Texas
Posted by Bayou Sam on 11/15/15 at 7:06 am
Those of you who are fans of the great contemporary take on the western will want to have a look at this article:
LINK
LINK
What is racism?
Posted by Bayou Sam on 3/16/15 at 8:22 am
Before you talk about whether racism does or does not exist, you need to know what it is. Now, I often see racism defined as "hating people because of their skin color." In fact, hatred is not essential to racism.
Here is the meaning of racism, courtesy of the Oxford English Dictionary:
So that's what racism is. Now we need to know: "how does racism exist"?
Racism, like any ideology, can exist in various forms. We can understand these forms along two axes.
First, the axis of theory and practice. That is, racism can both be understood as a "belief system" and "system of practices." Second, the axis of implicitness and explicitness.
These two axes are separable only on an ideal or abstract level. In reality, they freely intermix and can contradict each other. As in many ideological systems (e.g. religion, "being a gentleman," and so on), people can hold a specific belief but act quite differently from that belief.
Do many people hold explicitly or implicitly racist beliefs? Do many people treat others in explicitly or implicitly racist ways?
It seems to me that once you pose the question this way, it's very hard to deny that racism is dead.
Just something to think about.
Here is the meaning of racism, courtesy of the Oxford English Dictionary:
quote:
The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races. Hence: prejudice and antagonism towards people of other races, esp. those felt to be a threat to one's cultural or racial integrity or economic well-being; the expression of such prejudice in words or actions. Also occas. in extended use, with reference to people of other nationalities.
So that's what racism is. Now we need to know: "how does racism exist"?
Racism, like any ideology, can exist in various forms. We can understand these forms along two axes.
First, the axis of theory and practice. That is, racism can both be understood as a "belief system" and "system of practices." Second, the axis of implicitness and explicitness.
These two axes are separable only on an ideal or abstract level. In reality, they freely intermix and can contradict each other. As in many ideological systems (e.g. religion, "being a gentleman," and so on), people can hold a specific belief but act quite differently from that belief.
Do many people hold explicitly or implicitly racist beliefs? Do many people treat others in explicitly or implicitly racist ways?
It seems to me that once you pose the question this way, it's very hard to deny that racism is dead.
Just something to think about.
Anyone ever see Shock Corridor (1963)?
Posted by Bayou Sam on 3/7/15 at 9:26 am
Man, and I thought The Naked Kiss was good. This movie is just incredible. You can watch the trailer here, but it doesn't do justice to the movie's serious social commentary, and better still, sheer weirdness: LINK
It makes One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest look conventional and was clearly a deep influence on many of David Lynch's characters and images (e.g., the lunatic who thinks he's a confederate general).
It's available on hulu plus and youtube: LINK
It makes One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest look conventional and was clearly a deep influence on many of David Lynch's characters and images (e.g., the lunatic who thinks he's a confederate general).
It's available on hulu plus and youtube: LINK
Hard to be a God
Posted by Bayou Sam on 1/29/15 at 10:54 am
This one looks amazing. Opening in NYC this weekend:
trailer
AV club review
another review
trailer
AV club review
quote:
One of the first scenes, where two men giddily laugh as they smear shite on each other, does all the necessary explaining for his growing insanity.
another review
All these "libertarians"
Posted by Bayou Sam on 12/4/14 at 10:39 am
rejoicing at government employees killing unarmed citizens sure is amusing.
-18Peyton Manning
Posted by Bayou Sam on 11/30/14 at 9:52 pm
Is his arm shot? Ugly passing three games now.
Saints TE Ben Watson on Ferguson
Posted by Bayou Sam on 11/27/14 at 10:26 am
Sensible stuff.
Continues here: LINK
quote:
At some point while I was playing or preparing to play Monday Night Football, the news broke about the Ferguson Decision. After trying to figure out how I felt, I decided to write it down. Here are my thoughts:
I'M ANGRY because the stories of injustice that have been passed down for generations seem to be continuing before our very eyes.
I'M FRUSTRATED, because pop culture, music and movies glorify these types of police citizen altercations and promote an invincible attitude that continues to get young men killed in real life, away from safety movie sets and music studios.
I'M FEARFUL because in the back of my mind I know that although I'm a law abiding citizen I could still be looked upon as a "threat" to those who don't know me. So I will continue to have to go the extra mile to earn the benefit of the doubt.
I'M EMBARRASSED because the looting, violent protests, and law breaking only confirm, and in the minds of many, validate, the stereotypes and thus the inferior treatment.
I'M SAD, because another young life was lost from his family, the racial divide has widened, a community is in shambles, accusations, insensitivity hurt and hatred are boiling over, and we may never know the truth about what happened that day.
I'M SYMPATHETIC, because I wasn't there so I don't know exactly what happened. Maybe Darren Wilson acted within his rights and duty as an officer of the law and killed Michael Brown in self defense like any of us would in the circumstance. Now he has to fear the backlash against himself and his loved ones when he was only doing his job. What a horrible thing to endure. OR maybe he provoked Michael and ignited the series of events that led to him eventually murdering the young man to prove a point.
Continues here: LINK
Watch Harvard students take LA literacy test
Posted by Bayou Sam on 11/15/14 at 1:57 pm
Shrimp on a treadmill--the facts
Posted by Bayou Sam on 11/14/14 at 8:57 am
With the cutting of public science spending and EBOLA in the news, I thought this story would interest some people:
My own view is, predictably, that public spending on science is the last thing we should be cutting. The damage is far greater than the gain you get from mitigating the deficit.
LINK
quote:
A video clip of a shrimp running on a treadmill has somehow become the nation’s poster child for wasteful spending and grounds for the Republican-led House of Representatives science committee to recently investigate wasteful spending of NSF-funded research projects across the country.
My name is David, and I am the marine biologist who put a shrimp on a treadmill—a burden I will forever carry. To be clear, the treadmill did not cost millions of taxpayer dollars, the goal of the research was not to exercise shrimp, and the government did not pay me—or anyone else—to work out shrimp on treadmills.
quote:
Exactly how much taxpayer money did go into the now-famous shrimp treadmill? The treadmill was, in fact, made from spare parts—an old truck inner tube was used for the tread, the bearings were borrowed from a skateboard, and a used pump motor was salvaged to power the treadmill. The total price for the highly publicized icon of wasteful government research spending? Less than $50. (All of which I paid for out of my own pocket.)
My own view is, predictably, that public spending on science is the last thing we should be cutting. The damage is far greater than the gain you get from mitigating the deficit.
LINK
Flex question: Floyd or Moreno?
Posted by Bayou Sam on 9/13/14 at 3:03 pm
My instincts say Michael Floyd against the pitiful Giants but running backs tend to be more consistent.
Not surprised Obama is helping the Yazidi
Posted by Bayou Sam on 8/8/14 at 8:06 am
They worship Satan:
waiting for Alex Jones to tell me what to think about this.
quote:
Yazidi accounts of creation differ from that of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. They believe that God first created Tawûsê Melek from his own illumination (Ronahî) and the other six archangels were created later. God ordered Tawûsê Melek not to bow to other beings. Then God created the other archangels and ordered them to bring him dust (Ax) from the Earth (Erd) and build the body of Adam. Then God gave life to Adam from his own breath and instructed all archangels to bow to Adam. The archangels obeyed except for Tawûsê Melek. In answer to God, Tawûsê Melek replied, "How can I submit to another being! I am from your illumination while Adam is made of dust." Then God praised him and made him the leader of all angels and his deputy on the Earth. (This likely furthers what some see as a connection to the Islamic Shaytan, as according to the Quran he too refused to bow to Adam at God's command, though in this case it is seen as being a sign of Shaytan's sinful pride.)
Calvin Coolidge made ~70% more executive orders
Posted by Bayou Sam on 7/31/14 at 12:57 am
-18The myth of the Caliphate
Posted by Bayou Sam on 7/10/14 at 1:06 pm
Nice article in Al-Jazeera: LINK
And the rousing conclusion:
quote:
Caliph or Khalifa in Arabic, is used in Islamic tradition to connote theological successors to prophets. According to Sunni Muslims, the prophet of Islam had four "Rightly Guided" caliphs; subsequent caliphs were principally political leaders. A myth developed with the abolition of the Ottoman Caliphate in 1924, which advocated that to restore Islamic power it was necessary to unite all Muslims under a single caliphate.
Osama bin Laden lamented in a speech that the Muslim world had been deprived of a caliphate since the Ottomans. Few Muslims noticed the amusing irony in his comments. His Wahhabi-Saudi compatriots had revolted against the Ottomans, and hence that very caliphate.
The Ottoman caliphate coincided with the Safavid caliphate and the Mughal Empire, which occasionally claimed a caliphate. The Ottomans and the Safavids even went to war with each other. So, the idea of Islamic unity under a political caliphate, rather than a prophetic one, has no basis in history. Until Muslim scholars make that point clear, the uneducated will continue to be radicalised by false political notions.
And the rousing conclusion:
quote:
Muslims will always be attracted to the idea of restoring the dignity and leadership of their faith. They can best do this by reading history and pondering over the Quran. When Europe was gripped by centuries of violent religious bigotry, the 17th century English philosopher John Locke wrote enviously about the way in which Christians of all sects and Jews were able to worship freely in the Ottoman realm. The Quran goes beyond tolerance by making recognition of all religions an article of faith in Islam.
The most powerful weapon against extremist ideology is the knowledge that Islamic empires were not exclusively sustained by powerful armies - as was the case of Rome - nor supported by a strong naval fleet, as was the case in the British Empire. The sun set on Islamic power when it handed leadership over to the West in building societies dedicated to pluralism and knowledge - values that Islamic theology champions more highly than a martial jihad.
Review of N. Wade's book on race
Posted by Bayou Sam on 5/9/14 at 9:09 am
This is a review of the book Charles Murray famously (in some circles) and notoriously (in others) reviewed in the WSJ. The author is a political scientist and criticizes the book from that angle. Seems to me he crushes the argument, as far as a historian can. Sample quotations:
Of course, this criticism is from the point of view of history. The criticism from the point of view of anthropology, at least from what my anthro friends tell me, is that 1) Wade never gives a scientific definition of race (his definition is "common-sensical") 2) comparison to other animals is not apt, because genetic differentiation between human beings is far smaller than, say, within the African Chimpanzee 3) he assumes that genes are far more determinative than they actually are.
quote:
Wade’s argument has three parts: First, along with the divergence of physical traits such as skin color and types of earwax, racial groups have genetically evolved to differ in cognitive traits such as intelligence and creativity. Second, Wade argues that “minor differences, for the most part invisible in an individual, have major consequences at the level of a society.” Third, he writes that his views are uncomfortable truths that have been suppressed by a left-wing social-science establishment.
quote:
As a statistician and political scientist, I see naivete in Wade’s quickness to assume a genetic association for any change in social behavior. For example, he writes that declining interest rates in England from the years 1400 to 1850 “indicate that people were becoming less impulsive, more patient, and more willing to save” and attributes this to “the far-reaching genetic consequences” of rich people having more children, on average, than poor people, so that “the values of the upper middle class” were “infused into lower economic classes and throughout society.”
Similarly, he claims a genetic basis for the declining levels of everyday violence in Europe over the past 500 years and even for “a society-wide shift ... toward greater sensibility and more delicate manners.” All this is possible, but it seems to me that these sorts of stories explain too much. The trouble is that any change in attitudes or behavior can be imagined to be genetic—as long as the time scale is right.
quote:
Wade’s attitudes toward economics also seem a bit simplistic, for example when he writes, “Capital and information flow fairly freely, so what is it that prevents poor countries from taking out a loan, copying every Scandinavian institution, and becoming as rich and peaceful as Denmark?” The implication is that the answer is racial differences. But one might just as well ask why can’t Buffalo, New York, take out a loan and become as rich (per capita) as New York City. Or, for that matter, why can’t Portugal become as rich as Denmark? After all, Portuguese are Caucasians too! One could of course invoke a racial explanation for Portugal’s relative poverty, but Wade in his book generally refers to Europe or “the West” as a single unit. My point here is not that Haitians, Portuguese, and Danes are equivalent—obviously they differ in wealth, infrastructure, human capital, and so forth—but that it is not at all clear that genetic differences have much of anything to do with their different economic positions.
Of course, this criticism is from the point of view of history. The criticism from the point of view of anthropology, at least from what my anthro friends tell me, is that 1) Wade never gives a scientific definition of race (his definition is "common-sensical") 2) comparison to other animals is not apt, because genetic differentiation between human beings is far smaller than, say, within the African Chimpanzee 3) he assumes that genes are far more determinative than they actually are.
Cajun dude on npr
Posted by Bayou Sam on 2/25/14 at 8:48 am
Did anyone else just hear that old bruh named Beau (or Bo) Broussard on NPR say that he didn't vote for Obama in 2008 and won't vote for Mary Landrieu because "he don't vote for black people, lady. I was raised that they have their place and I have mine"??
Yikes!
Yikes!
Moses Farrow: of course Allen did not rape my sister
Posted by Bayou Sam on 2/5/14 at 2:29 pm
LINK
quote:
... Moses Farrow is speaking out to defend Allen—and accuse their mother, Mia Farrow, of poisoning the children against their father. "My mother drummed it into me to hate my father for tearing apart the family and sexually molesting my sister," Moses, 36, tells PEOPLE in the magazine's new issue. "And I hated him for her for years. I see now that this was a vengeful way to pay him back for falling in love with Soon-Yi." ...
"Of course Woody did not molest my sister," says Moses, who is estranged from Farrow and many of his siblings and is close to Allen and Soon-Yi. "She loved him and looked forward to seeing him when he would visit. She never hid from him until our mother succeeded in creating the atmosphere of fear and hate towards him. The day in question, there were six or seven of us in the house. We were all in public rooms and no one, not my father or sister, was off in any private spaces. My mother was conveniently out shopping. I don’t know if my sister really believes she was molested or is trying to please her mother. Pleasing my mother was very powerful motivation because to be on her wrong side was horrible."
Ben Tate or Andre Brown?
Posted by Bayou Sam on 12/12/13 at 8:28 pm
Non-ppr. Brown at Seahawks, Tate at Colts. Not sure if I can trust Tate but the match-ups are clear.
|

6
