Started By
Message
How Evil Disney abused copyright law, killed public domain and American culture
Posted on 11/6/18 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 11/6/18 at 5:06 pm
Disney has been bending American copyright laws to their will for decades in order to keep Mickey Mouse from entering the public domain. Because of Disney nothing new entered the public domain between 1998 and this year. Because of Disney it takes things 95 years to enter the public domain now (it was 56 years before Disney started meddling). Who knows what sort of works we've missed out on seeing on television or film because of Disney... Ironic since that's what they've built their corporation on, recycling other people's stories from the public domain.
LINK

LINK
quote:
Mickey Mouse was brought into the world in 1928, under the 1909 Copyright Act, entitling him to 56 years of protection under the law -- no more. In accordance with the law, his copyright was set to expire in 1984.
As this date drew near, Disney (the corporation) grew increasingly anxious. By this time, Mickey was worth billionsin annual revenue, and had become the face of the company; losing him to the public domain would be a massive financial blow. Quietly, Disney took to Washington and began lobbying Congress for new copyright legislation
quote:
In 1976 -- just 8 years prior to Mickey’s expiration -- Congress completely overhauled U.S. copyright law to conform with European standards. This new law expanded already-published corporate copyrights from 56 years to a maximum of 75 years. All works published prior to 1922 immediately entered the public domain; all works published after 1922 (including Mickey Mouse) were entitled to the full 75 years of protection. Just like that, Mickey Mouse extended his copyright death 19 years -- from 1984 to 2003.
By the mid-1990s, Disney again began to feel the impending doom. In addition to the 2003 expiration of Mickey’s copyright, Pluto was set to expire in 2005, Goofy in 2007, and Donald Duck in 2009. The gang, collectively worth billions, had to be retained, so Disney began lobbying again.
In 1997, Congress introduced the Copyright Term Extension Act, which proposed to extend corporate copyrights again -- this time, from 75 to 95 years. To ensure the bill passed, Disney cozied up to legislators.
quote:
Watchdog records show that the Disney Political Action Committee (PAC) paid out a total of $149,612 in direct campaign contributions to those considering the bill. Of the bill’s 25 sponsors (12 in the Senate, and 13 in the House), 19 received money from Disney’s CEO, Michael Eisner. In one instance, Eisner paid Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS) $1,000 on the very same day that he signed on as a co-sponsor.
quote:
"We regard our lobbying as proprietary to us,” Disney spokesman Thomas J. Deegan stated, when confronted by CNN in 1998. “We don't wish to talk about it."
quote:
On October 27, 1998, Mickey Mouse’s copyright was extended another 20 years, to 2023.
In the entire congressional committee, only one man -- Senator Hank Brown -- opposed the bill. "The real incentive [was] for corporate owners that bought copyrights to lobby Congress for another 20 years of revenue,” he later said. "I thought it was a moral outrage. There wasn't anyone speaking out for the public interest."
Posted on 11/6/18 at 6:04 pm to BowlJackson
So, what you are saying, is that if I have money, I can manipulate the legal system.
:Double rainbow:
:Double rainbow:
Posted on 11/6/18 at 7:23 pm to BowlJackson
I watch youtube videos of people at WDW every now an then. A candied apple costs like $8.99.
Disney is winning.
Disney is winning.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:15 pm to BowlJackson
Disney is such a garbage company.
Posted on 11/7/18 at 8:52 am to BowlJackson
Comic book companies, and one of the big two is now owned by Disney, did the same thing.
Its shady stuff buying legislators to pass laws you want passed... but if I had been the CEO of Disney I'd have been there shoveling out the cash to Congress too. With billions of dollars in profits at stake its your job to protect that revenue source, if it means greasing a few palms in Congress so be it.
Its not Disney I'm annoyed with in this scenario, its Congress. Disney dangled a little cash in front of them and the Representatives and Senators from both parties couldn't take it fast enough. The sad reality is that is that if you are the CEO of a company as big as Disney and you don't have a small army of bought and paid for politicians you aren't doing your job.
Its shady stuff buying legislators to pass laws you want passed... but if I had been the CEO of Disney I'd have been there shoveling out the cash to Congress too. With billions of dollars in profits at stake its your job to protect that revenue source, if it means greasing a few palms in Congress so be it.
Its not Disney I'm annoyed with in this scenario, its Congress. Disney dangled a little cash in front of them and the Representatives and Senators from both parties couldn't take it fast enough. The sad reality is that is that if you are the CEO of a company as big as Disney and you don't have a small army of bought and paid for politicians you aren't doing your job.
Popular
Back to top
