Started By
Message
re: 9/11 Was A Conspiracy!
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:42 pm to KSGamecock
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:42 pm to KSGamecock
quote:
frick you, I'm never sarcastic. You're a nazi communist expat.
See, Straws -- he's not ever sarcastic.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:43 pm to Sleeping Tiger
It's true. I hate SDAR with a passion.
But for real though, explain your allegation of a CIA-Taliban connection.
But for real though, explain your allegation of a CIA-Taliban connection.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:46 pm to KSGamecock
quote:
frick you, I'm never sarcastic. You're a nazi communist expat.

Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:46 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
See, Straws -- he's not ever sarcastic.
You are autistic if this isn't sarcastic.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:49 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
You are autistic if this isn't sarcastic.
If you have to ask then you can surely count a box of fallen toothpicks in a second.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:52 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
If you have to ask then you can surely count a box of fallen toothpicks in a second.
You should be ashamed that I think you're stupid enough to take that as seriousness -- like you took his other comment serious and tried to use it to bolster your argument.
Seriously, there's a reason people think you're a goddamn sociopath on here.
You think it's perfectly reasonable for you to deny an argument on its face because "you've seen it too much", but when I see your familiar bullshite coming down the chute I get out of the way and you call me a coward.
You've got serious issues with your ego, man. I'd hate to be there when that facade gets taken down.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:57 pm to Ross
quote:
it's better than NOTHING.
In fact I did share things earlier in this thread, like eye witness accounts of fireman reporting molten metal, and showed that official documents reported molten metal at the scene weeks after the event.
Imagine if all of you were pro conspiracy and I was defending the official story -- if you shared video of fireman saying there was molten metal and I said they are mistaken and can't be taken seriously you'd all laugh at my ignorance.
I recommend the research of Dr Steven Jones, physics professor at BYU. A simple googling of his name, maybe with 911 truth after it might yield some good results, and a very pleasant voice to listen too.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:59 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
You think it's perfectly reasonable for you to deny an argument on its face because "you've seen it too much"
Where did I say that?
quote:
You should be ashamed that I think you're stupid enough to take that as seriousness -- like you took his other comment serious and tried to use it to bolster your argument.
Oh please.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:02 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Oh please.
Oh please what? You just fricking said it. "KSGamecock even said blah blah blah." You may be a smart guy, but you have to start learning to be wrong.
Your life is going to be way, way easier when you get over that because then you can have constructive conversations without other people calling you batshit insane.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:05 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
Oh please what? You just fricking said it. "KSGamecock even said blah blah blah." You may be a smart guy, but you have to start learning to be wrong.
That's not what I was saying 'oh please' about.
And nice dodge, where did I reject his argument because it's something I've seen it too much?
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:10 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I've spent a regrettable amount of time debating about 911 in years past, I can say, with honesty that what you came at me with in this thread was the weakest I've ever seen by someone putting in a legitimate effort to communicate.
I like your edit, too, though.
Edit: What's really embarrassing is I thought to directly copy the entire thing just in case you'd go ahead and doctor things up a little bit.
Regardless, you said an argument was too weak to be responded to, you're a hypocrite no matter the semantics.
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:19 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Sleeping Tiger, it's admirable that you've largely taken on the board alone in this thread with little support from anyone, I think that's very strong stuff from you. Some of the things these people are saying are right though, bro. I'll leave it at that but I've been around the block with some of the things displayed in this thread.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:20 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
I like your edit, too, though.
Edit: What's really embarrassing is I thought to directly copy the entire thing just in case you'd go ahead and doctor things up a little bit.
Regardless, you said an argument was too weak to be responded to, you're a hypocrite no matter the semantics.
How drunk are you? I hope very.
You got caught misrepresenting what I said, I never said I reject his argument because I've seen it too many times, in fact what I said is nothing like that at all. And I actually have been responding to him.
Your weirdness just keeps getting weirder.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:21 pm to Stacked
quote:
Some of the things these people are saying are right though, bro
Like?
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:22 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Some of the things these people are saying are right though, bro
Like?
The more ya know.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:24 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Imagine if all of you were pro conspiracy and I was defending the official story -- if you shared video of fireman saying there was molten metal and I said they are mistaken and can't be taken seriously you'd all laugh at my ignorance.
I could give a shite what the majority of people think on any issue when it comes to finding the truth. The truth is found by applying natural laws to observations and evidence, and the prognosis it gives you is that the failure in the structures of the World Trade Center was due to the damage of heat shielding on perimeter supports, extended exposure to the heat of combustion of Jet Fuel A-1 which lowered the tensile strength low enough to cause failure in more supports, which gradually led to complete failure.
This is why your side is in the minority, because the evidence doesn't point you in the direction of thermite or whatever it is that you propose. I'm sorry, it just doesn't.
Sleeping Tiger, you might be a great guy in real life, maybe even fun to grab a beer with, but you are damn delusional.
I give you some facts about the materials used in the construction of the towers, you say they don't apply to the building, so I apply them to the building, you say I don't, so I give you a great article from a scientific journal with some really awesome sources that gives you all the detail I could ever give you, and you without a second thought dismiss it. This is why you are mocked, if I had to guess.
This discussion is pointless and I think I'm done with it. I'll give your Dr. Steven Jones a listen and I'll report in if I find anything in it interesting at all.
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:27 pm to Ross
quote:
I'll give your Dr. Steven Jones a listen and I'll report in if I find anything in it interesting at all.
Please do,

Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:30 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Please do,
A man that can't be told anything cannot learn anything.
It's amazing that out of all that Ross said, the most you could parse out of it was perhaps the least important fragment. I'd love for you to use this as a learning experience, but I think everyone knows you're lost in your own little world where nothing is relevant unless you say it is and everything you say is backed by novels of scientific evidence.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:38 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
StrawsDrawnAtRandom
You're like a robot because you can't possibly be a man, a man, even a bad one has a spec of integrity deep inside him, you continue to show none at all.
You misrepresented what I said, got called out for it, bizarrely tried to justify it, got called out for that and then act like nothing happened, no shame, just continued attacks, it's incredible.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:40 pm to Ross
Ross nailed it. This is simple, it really is.
Back to top
