Started By
Message
Been telling you guys about Vanderbilt.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 11/5/16 at 2:11 pm
Them boys are legit. Auburn blasted Arkansas.
1
Posted on 11/5/16 at 4:18 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
And Arkansas is blasting Florida. Funny how these things work out.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 5:54 pm to slayerxing
Sure is. Can't believe how poorly we showed up today.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 6:36 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
We've played this way all year. The bad schedule helped mask the problems.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 6:42 pm to TJGator1215
quote:
We've played this way all year. The bad schedule helped mask the problems.
That's just not true -- we seem to have this point where you take something that's bad and try to make it seem like it's the end of the Earth.
We've moved the ball consistently, Arkansas had a bad defense and this is what happened:
Coaching completely failed to prepare for the game. Their plan sucked, and they seemed to take three and a half quarters to figure out what we figured out in the first minute.
I have no idea how coaches can make boneheaded decisions when it seems so obvious from the sideline. ''Run the ball.'' -- Seahawks.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 6:45 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
No we have had a bad schedule we have played 3 teams with winning records and are 1-2 against them with our one win vs Kentucky.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 6:48 pm to gatorbait_007
quote:
No we have had a bad schedule we have played 3 teams with winning records and are 1-2 against them with our one win vs Kentucky.
Having a losing record doesn't mean they're a bad team. Our best wins at this point were against Kentucky whom we blew out and against Vandy whom we edged. We had a good win against Georgia this week but it just looks like the offense can't get it together.
That being said: Do you guys really not think we could have at least contended if we changed our offensive playcalling around?
Why are we playing so many high risk balls when it's uncalled for? Make it make sense.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 6:55 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
Having a losing record doesn't mean they're a bad team.
So that means they are a good team who cant win half of their games. Seriously then what does a losing record make them. I would say a losing record makes them a team UF should beat with a 2nd string QB.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 7:00 pm to gatorbait_007
quote:
So that means they are a good team who cant win half of their games. Seriously then what does a losing record make them. I would say a losing record makes them a team UF should beat with a 2nd string QB.
Vanderbilt was a few plays away from going to overtime with Auburn this week.
Georgia isn't a terrible team, they're not good, but didn't they beat NC? They're 7 - 2 and winning their side of the conference.
Vanderbilt lost by one possession in four games, including some stupidly high-octane offenses.
Our wins aren't great, but they're not terrible either is all I'm saying.
And what UF team are you talking about?
Before McElwain was here we were losing to Missouri, Vanderbilt, well, everyone. We've got a lot of cleaning house to do, and we're gonna need another quarterback. It's just too hard to overcome.
Hopefully, through some miracle, we bounce back.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 7:01 pm to gatorbait_007
Let it go bro. They're too invested in Mac. I've tried. There's always an excuse or reason why this team sucks and Mac never is at fault.
Posted on 11/5/16 at 7:03 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Any UF team in the last 10 years shouldn't lose to a sub .500 team even under Muschamp. The Missouri teams we lost to won the SEC East. No excuse for losing to Vandy. That's my point UF should never lose to a .500 team I bet if you looked at the spread over the last 10yrs against teams that had a losing record we would be projected to win. The 4-8 year may be the only year with an exception.
This post was edited on 11/5/16 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 11/5/16 at 7:06 pm to gatorbait_007
quote:
Any UF team in the last 10 years shouldn't lose to a sub .500 team even under Muschamp. The Missouri teams we lost to won the SEC East. No excuse for losing to Vandy. That's my point UF should never lose to a .500 team I bet if you looked at the spread over the last 10yrs against teams that had a losing record we would be projected to win. The 4-8 year may be the only year with an exception.
Arkansas is six and three and their only losses have come to the best three teams in the West.
I'm not sure where you're going with this, has Mac lost to a sub .500?
Posted on 11/5/16 at 7:09 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
lost to a sub .500?
I'm saying 12 of his 16 wins are against .500 or worse teams. Teams that we should beat. So his win loss record to me is bogus and loaded with teams that any team over the last 10yrs should win regardless of who is at QB at UF.
This post was edited on 11/5/16 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 11/5/16 at 7:10 pm to gatorbait_007
quote:
I'm saying 12 of his 16 wins are against .500 or worse teams. Teams that we should beat. So his win loss record to me is bogus and loaded with teams that any team over the last 10yrs should win regardless of who is at QB.
But the reason that he lost those games is strictly because he hasn't had a quarterback, and still doesn't have a quarterback. Treon Harris wasn't the answer, and we have no idea what he'd look like with Grier in as quarterback.
Gotta call it like we see it: Team won't accomplish that without a quarterback or at the very least better playcalling.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News