Started By
Message

re: SEC HC rankings

Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:33 am to
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
25125 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Well. . . No shite. But the other poster asked if recruiting should be included in ranking head coaches so I responded that it should be since it’s a part of their job. No one is arguing it carries more weight than trophies.


It should not be considered. Winning trophies is the only metric that matters for coaches. The rest all feed into it, but they are completely irrelevant if no trophies are won.




Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40210 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 9:45 am to
quote:

It should not be considered. Winning trophies is the only metric that matters for coaches. The rest all feed into it, but they are completely irrelevant if no trophies are won.


Congrats, it's still early in the day but this is the dumbest thing I'll read on here all day.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
59016 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

It should not be considered. Winning trophies is the only metric that matters for coaches. The rest all feed into it, but they are completely irrelevant if no trophies are won.



Crap dude. gene Chizik won a trophy as a HC.

So did Larry Coker, and Bobby Ross. No. Winning a National Championship does not give you an edge over a coach that does not.

Well, it does a little, but there have been some pretty bad coaches that have won national Championships.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter